I dont understand this move
-
entropi
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 6:20 am
- Rank: sdk
- GD Posts: 175
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 71 times
I dont understand this move
I have seen this move a lot in high dan games, but fail to understand the merits of it.
I don't know if it's joseki, but it seems to violate every single "basic principle" I know, thus creating short circuits, stack overflows and deadlocks in my poor brain.
This move is neither and extension, nor an invasion, nor a reduction, nor a defense, ...
It looks like an attacking move, but then my question would be what happened to the principle "don't touch the weak stone when attacking"?
Maybe it's a probe. In this case, I would guess black is supposed to chose between the d18 stone and the top (towards the right side). But then I still don't see why this move is necessary for white. What prevents white from immediately taking either the corner or the top (i.e. without reinforcing black).
On top of that, how would white answer B-f16, which would be my first instict move?
Thanks in advance for eventual answers.
If you say no, Elwood and I will come here for breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day of the week.
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
-
entropi
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 6:20 am
- Rank: sdk
- GD Posts: 175
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 71 times
Re:
EdLee wrote:1. There are no weak groups.entropi wrote:what happened to the principle "don't touch the weak stone when attacking"?
2. All principles, proverbs, and guidelines are exactly that -- they are merely general ideas; every situation is different and there are always exceptions.
1. Do you think f17-d18 stones are already strong enough? I am not sure about that. It is usual to attack such a group from the left side, isn't it? Of course black has the 3-3 option but that's the trade, black takes the corner white the top.
2. Of course, but there must be a reason for violating basic principles. This is precisely what I am asking
If you say no, Elwood and I will come here for breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day of the week.
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
-
mw42
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 566
- Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2010 10:01 pm
- Rank: 1k
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: mw42
- Has thanked: 39 times
- Been thanked: 59 times
Re: I dont understand this move
See http://www.gocommentary.com/free-videos ... go-07.html for some discussion on that move.
- Shaddy
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 1206
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:44 pm
- Rank: KGS 5d
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Str1fe, Midorisuke
- Has thanked: 51 times
- Been thanked: 192 times
Re: I dont understand this move
entropi wrote:
I have seen this move a lot in high dan games, but fail to understand the merits of it.
I don't know if it's joseki, but it seems to violate every single "basic principle" I know, thus creating short circuits, stack overflows and deadlocks in my poor brain.
This move is neither and extension, nor an invasion, nor a reduction, nor a defense, ...
It looks like an attacking move, but then my question would be what happened to the principle "don't touch the weak stone when attacking"?
Maybe it's a probe. In this case, I would guess black is supposed to chose between the d18 stone and the top (towards the right side). But then I still don't see why this move is necessary for white. What prevents white from immediately taking either the corner or the top (i.e. without reinforcing black).
On top of that, how would white answer B-f16, which would be my first instict move?
Thanks in advance for eventual answers.
If you played f16, white hanes underneath at f18. Black's shape looks pretty ugly at this point. Joseki is g16, and g18 is ok if black has the ladder. I think this one is played when white wants to develop the top, but I've never tried it myself, so I can't talk in detail.
-
entropi
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 6:20 am
- Rank: sdk
- GD Posts: 175
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 71 times
Re: I dont understand this move
mw42 wrote:See http://www.gocommentary.com/free-videos ... go-07.html for some discussion on that move.
Thank you. But I cannot watch the video. It may be because of my companies firewall and/or because of the China firewall (as stated on the page). I will try again later.
EdLee wrote:Of course. There are no weak groups yet; and both B and W can play lightly.entropi wrote:1. Do you think f17-d18 stones are already strong enough?
But even if they are to be assumed strong, this still does not explain what whites move achieves. If the black group is considered strong, then this move is even less likely to have an attacking purpose. Anyway, maybe it's a kind of probe but is still highly mysterous to me.
EdLee wrote:And yes, it's joseki.
Yes, I have seen it is considered joseki (eidogo), which means that there must be a good explanation of it somewhere. I hope the video link of mw42 will work at home.
If you say no, Elwood and I will come here for breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day of the week.
-
gowan
- Gosei
- Posts: 1628
- Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2010 4:40 am
- Rank: senior player
- GD Posts: 1000
- Has thanked: 546 times
- Been thanked: 450 times
Re: I dont understand this move
A number of variations are shown on this SL page: http://senseis.xmp.net/?44PointLowAppro ... lideAttach
-
entropi
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 493
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 6:20 am
- Rank: sdk
- GD Posts: 175
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 71 times
Re: I dont understand this move
Shaddy wrote:If you played f16, white hanes underneath at f18. Black's shape looks pretty ugly at this point.
Yes, it looks obvious once you mention it
gowan wrote:A number of variations are shown on this SL page: http://senseis.xmp.net/?44PointLowAppro ... lideAttach
Thank you very much this explains a lot.
If you say no, Elwood and I will come here for breakfast, lunch, and dinner every day of the week.
- daniel_the_smith
- Gosei
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:51 am
- Rank: 2d AGA
- GD Posts: 1193
- KGS: lavalamp
- Tygem: imapenguin
- IGS: lavalamp
- OGS: daniel_the_smith
- Location: Silicon Valley
- Has thanked: 152 times
- Been thanked: 330 times
- Contact:
Re: I dont understand this move
I'm late to the party, I know--
It's fairly common in pro play, it gets played a little less than 10% of the time. It looks like white usually has a position in the opposing corner when playing it:

I've heard Mr. Yang refer to this move as "switching direction".
It's fairly common in pro play, it gets played a little less than 10% of the time. It looks like white usually has a position in the opposing corner when playing it:
I've heard Mr. Yang refer to this move as "switching direction".
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com