Joseki Mistake - special case?
- judicata
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:55 pm
- Rank: KGS 1k
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: judicata
- Location: New York, NY
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 150 times
Joseki Mistake - special case?
The diagram below
is a commonly-identified (local) mistake. Of course, as with many such moves, there must be special cases for it. The position below is from a game between Yi Se-tol (Lee Sedol) and Ch'oe Ch'eol-han (both 9p). The position looks pretty normal, so I'm having trouble finding the reason for
. I assume it has something to do with attacking H3, which would (and did) lead to a running fight (after white responded at C3, black pincered at K3). Moreover, in my database (GoGoD, SmartGo, and some individual games I've added),
is the second most commonly played move in this joseki, albeit a distant second (nearly 600 for J4, and 109 for D2). Anyone have any insight into when this it is better than J4? Is it just when black wants to develop long the bottom or lower-right?
-
hyperpape
- Tengen
- Posts: 4382
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:24 pm
- Rank: AGA 3k
- GD Posts: 65
- OGS: Hyperpape 4k
- Location: Caldas da Rainha, Portugal
- Has thanked: 499 times
- Been thanked: 727 times
Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?
Pro opinion has changed. See the first sgf in Bill's post: http://lifein19x19.com/forum/viewtopic. ... sei#p77638. (Good timing to ask that so soon after that thread).
- jts
- Oza
- Posts: 2665
- Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:17 pm
- Rank: kgs 6k
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 310 times
- Been thanked: 634 times
Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?
But even if pros are reevaluating the pros and cons of this move, the cons are still there... Bantari posted a (imo) great discussion of the weaknesses of this shape a while back.
http://www.bantari.com/go/writings/blooper_001.php
http://www.bantari.com/go/writings/blooper_001.php
-
Kirby
- Honinbo
- Posts: 9553
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:04 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Kirby
- Tygem: 커비라고해
- Has thanked: 1583 times
- Been thanked: 1707 times
Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?
If black was Lee Sedol, then his choosing it was reason enough. I'm pretty sure he doesn't play by proverbs. 
Seriously, though, my feeling is that this move is played if you want to prevent this: I guess you probably already figured that, but it's explanation enough for me.
Seriously, though, my feeling is that this move is played if you want to prevent this: I guess you probably already figured that, but it's explanation enough for me.
be immersed
-
RobertJasiek
- Judan
- Posts: 6273
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:54 pm
- GD Posts: 0
- Been thanked: 797 times
- Contact:
Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?
Black 2 makes it about impossible for White to defend a group developing from H3 by cutting at F4.
Otherwise it is all about whether one expects Black C3 to be reasonable later.
Otherwise it is all about whether one expects Black C3 to be reasonable later.
- ez4u
- Oza
- Posts: 2414
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:15 pm
- Rank: Jp 6 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: ez4u
- Location: Tokyo, Japan
- Has thanked: 2351 times
- Been thanked: 1332 times
Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?
This is a relatively little-used joseki that dates back to the 50's at least. Black generally wants to pincer from a Black position in the lower right, as in the case cited. Most often the pincer used has been
but "a" and "b" have also been played (according to GoGoD). Go Seigen's comment (in Bill's post referenced above) that an immediate "c" is important has not been embraced by the rest of the pro's, although it has been played a few times. The game cited continued as below. It is Game 1 from the 25th KBS Cup Final, played 2006-10-23.
Dave Sigaty
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21
"Short-lived are both the praiser and the praised, and rememberer and the remembered..."
- Marcus Aurelius; Meditations, VIII 21
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?
About Go Seigen's comment:ez4u wrote: This is a relatively little-used joseki that dates back to the 50's at least. Black generally wants to pincer from a Black position in the lower right, as in the case cited. Most often the pincer used has beenbut "a" and "b" have also been played (according to GoGoD). Go Seigen's comment (in Bill's post referenced above) that an immediate "c" is important has not been embraced by the rest of the pro's, although it has been played a few times. The game cited continued as below. It is Game 1 from the 25th KBS Cup Final, played 2006-10-23.
I think that the existence of a White stone on the left side star point ("d") is what makes the second jump better than the pincer. It is that stone that makes
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
- judicata
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:55 pm
- Rank: KGS 1k
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: judicata
- Location: New York, NY
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 150 times
Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?
Very interesting - I had missed that.hyperpape wrote:Pro opinion has changed. See the first sgf in Bill's post: http://lifein19x19.com/forum/viewtopic. ... sei#p77638. (Good timing to ask that so soon after that thread).
Thanks for the comments. It amazes me how a widely rejected move can become accepted (and perhaps rejected again later). This one seems particularly interesting, since this is a "typical mistake" 10 kyus are taught to avoid.
-
Mef
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:34 am
- Rank: KGS [-]
- GD Posts: 428
- Location: Central Coast
- Has thanked: 201 times
- Been thanked: 333 times
Re: Joseki Mistake - special case?
judicata wrote:Very interesting - I had missed that.hyperpape wrote:Pro opinion has changed. See the first sgf in Bill's post: http://lifein19x19.com/forum/viewtopic. ... sei#p77638. (Good timing to ask that so soon after that thread).
Thanks for the comments. It amazes me how a widely rejected move can become accepted (and perhaps rejected again later). This one seems particularly interesting, since this is a "typical mistake" 10 kyus are taught to avoid.
I think this is one of those cases (much like the kick in response to a low approach), which you first want to make the move, you want to do so for the wrong reasons. Later you find out sometimes there are reasons it might be good...