Hi everyone!
I have some trouble with the evaluation of a corner sequence I never encountered before from a recent kgs game. It would be nice if some stronger players could comment on this. Although the result was not bad for me, it still somehow feels as if my opponent got away easy.
It started from here (I'm white):
My idea was this (5 could also be at a):
Instead it went like this, which felt good for w:
Now black surprised me with 1. In retrospect, I think I should have resisted strongly with a. In the game I wanted to keep things simple but it seems white can handle the fight.
continuation:
The result is very peaceful (maybe too much so?). White is not small and has swallowed the marked stone while black has considerable thickness, but white has sente. I probably should have played at a next. Instead I wanted too much with b and got seperated while facing blacks aforementioned thickness. Won the fight with a bit of luck though...
What is your opinion? Is this result equal? Should white fight with a as mentioned in the 4th diagram? Are there other options for either player?
Evaluation of a corner sequence
-
HermanHiddema
- Gosei
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:08 am
- Rank: Dutch 4D
- GD Posts: 645
- Universal go server handle: herminator
- Location: Groningen, NL
- Has thanked: 202 times
- Been thanked: 1086 times
Re: Evaluation of a corner sequence
This is joseki:
In the game sequence, you can resist like this:
Now, black will have two groups to deal with.
The end result from the game is simple, and doesn't look bad for either player, IMO. Given the influence, a follow-up to neutralize the influence would indeed have been better
In the game sequence, you can resist like this:
Now, black will have two groups to deal with.
The end result from the game is simple, and doesn't look bad for either player, IMO. Given the influence, a follow-up to neutralize the influence would indeed have been better
-
flOvermind
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:19 am
- Rank: EGF 4 kyu
- GD Posts: 627
- Location: Linz, Austria
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
Re: Evaluation of a corner sequence
A little side-note:golem7 wrote:
does not cut 
and 
, you can connect by attaching at 'a'. The joseki move of at 'b' does cut 
That doesn't really change the way you should play in this position, but it's useful to know for evaluating the position. Even if black hadn't made the mistake of
at 'c', you'd still be slightly better than joseki 
-
Redundant
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 3:00 pm
- Rank: lazy
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: redundant/silchas
- Tygem: redundant
- Wbaduk: redundant
- DGS: redundant
- OGS: redundant
- Location: Pittsburgh
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 103 times
Re: Evaluation of a corner sequence
Note that the connection at a implicitly offers 5 as sacrifice.flOvermind wrote:A little side-note:golem7 wrote:
That doesn't really change the way you should play in this position, but it's useful to know for evaluating the position. Even if black hadn't made the mistake of
-
pwaldron
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 8:40 am
- GD Posts: 1072
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 182 times
Re: Evaluation of a corner sequence
If this is the joseki you're talking about, white still has a connection at 'a' if necessary. It's not usually played, but it's there.flOvermind wrote: The joseki move of
-
golem7
- Dies with sente
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 6:51 pm
- Rank: kgs 2d
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 33 times
Re: Evaluation of a corner sequence
Thanks for your thoughts so far. Indeed I know the joseki you showed, but I thought it only applies in case black has the marked stone already. Without this stone, after 8, white settles easily on the right while black's stones have no base. If black plays something on the right instead of 8, his stones on the top will come under severe attack while at the same time he will still need another move on the right side to completely subdue the white stone. That's why I thought black overplayed. Am I missing something?
Btw, herman I never even thought about the move you suggested. Gotta study and add it to my repertoire.
Btw, herman I never even thought about the move you suggested. Gotta study and add it to my repertoire.
-
flOvermind
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:19 am
- Rank: EGF 4 kyu
- GD Posts: 627
- Location: Linz, Austria
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 43 times
Re: Evaluation of a corner sequence
Interesting... Now that you post it, it's obvious, but I have always thought white is cut herepwaldron wrote:If this is the joseki you're talking about, white still has a connection at 'a' if necessary. It's not usually played, but it's there.flOvermind wrote: The joseki move of