I was solving some problems from the Graded Go Problems for Beginners Vol. II, and I am a bit confused about one of the given answers to a problem (54). Given the diagram below, the instructions are to find how Black should play in response to White 1. The most obvious choices seem to be Black at A, B, or C. After some consideration, I thought that A seemed to be the best answer. After all, this seems to give Black some more influence on the outside, while providing a solid connection of four stones.
However, the given answer is Black to play at B. After being somewhat surprised at the answer, I played out what seemed to be the most likely sequence to follow (see diagram below) and I don’t understand the advantage that this gives black, especially after White plays the cut at 4, and then escapes with 6. I guess that Black could then cut at A, followed by White playing the atari at B, but I still don’t see how this is the best sequence for Black.
Also, if black decides to respond to White 1 in the above diagram by setting up a bamboo joint at C, he can then keep his two pairs of black stones connected no matter what White plays next. So, in conclusion, both Black plays at A and C in the above diagram seem to be better choices than the given answer of B.
The correct answer (B, first diagram) in the back of the book merely states that this move is a basic joseki. The given incorrect answer (Black to play at A in the first diagram) states that White then moves into the corner at B, and that White suffers a big loss, but it seems to me like this gives Black some outside influence in compensation, without having his stones cut. Could someone please explain this? Thanks!
Confused about an opening sequence
-
Go_Japan
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 6:18 pm
- Rank: KGS 3-5k
- GD Posts: 0
- Location: Japan
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: Confused about an opening sequence
I could be wrong, but I think the best response to White 4 is to play Black at 6. If white escapes the atari, extend along the bottom. White cannot easily kill the 3 black stones.
-
illluck
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 1223
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:07 am
- Rank: OGS 2d
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: illluck
- Tygem: Trickprey
- OGS: illluck
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 239 times
Re: Confused about an opening sequence
White cannot play the cut. Black can play as below because white can only protect against one of a and b (I think the cut directly probably works too, but more complicated).
The 3-3 point at 1 is so incredibly important, not just in terms of points, but also for group stability. Compare the two corners below and see if you feel the MASSIVE difference in terms of corner points and group strength (though here black has the 4-10 points, so the black group is not that much weaker).
The lower left is the joseki, the upper right is the bad shape (http://senseis.xmp.net/?EmptyTriangle) block. Note in both cases it's white to move next, so there's no difference due to an extra move.
Also, note that the lower left is better in terms of "influence" as well - the top right group is actually WEAKER due to bad shape in comparison.
The 3-3 point at 1 is so incredibly important, not just in terms of points, but also for group stability. Compare the two corners below and see if you feel the MASSIVE difference in terms of corner points and group strength (though here black has the 4-10 points, so the black group is not that much weaker).
The lower left is the joseki, the upper right is the bad shape (http://senseis.xmp.net/?EmptyTriangle) block. Note in both cases it's white to move next, so there's no difference due to an extra move.
Also, note that the lower left is better in terms of "influence" as well - the top right group is actually WEAKER due to bad shape in comparison.
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
Re: Confused about an opening sequence
There are a number of variations, but this should give you an idea why pushing and cutting is not good. 
Edit: Added a couple of variations.
Edit: Added a couple of variations.
Last edited by Bill Spight on Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:41 am, edited 2 times in total.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
-
illluck
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 1223
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:07 am
- Rank: OGS 2d
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: illluck
- Tygem: Trickprey
- OGS: illluck
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 239 times
Re: Confused about an opening sequence
There are more difficult lines of resistance by white (e.g. an empty triangle to remove a liberty rather than connect - though here black's stone on the left side probably removes the danger), but overall the idea is that the cut does not work (though I'm not confident I'll play it correctly :p).
-
EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
(a) should be suspect to you right away because it makes an empty triangle
extend (in reply to 
hane), 
extend, and 
block is a basic shape;-
blade90
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:16 am
- Rank: KGS 2k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: blade90
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Confused about an opening sequence
If you are a beginner then what you must really know is:
Black 'a' prevents white to dive into your corner, why is that important? There are 2 reasons:
1. Black secures most of the corner by playing a
2. If black closes the corner then white does not have a base yet + he still has a cutting point, in other words white is not alive and will come under attack.
The most important is 2. of course.
If white follows the joseki he will not push and cut but make a hanging connection to protect the cutting point - this also creates a small base, and white the one point jump (this is shown in illluck's 2nd dia.).
Note that white can still be attacked later, this group is pincered and even if it lives it is not worth much.
Black 'a' prevents white to dive into your corner, why is that important? There are 2 reasons:
1. Black secures most of the corner by playing a
2. If black closes the corner then white does not have a base yet + he still has a cutting point, in other words white is not alive and will come under attack.
The most important is 2. of course.
If white follows the joseki he will not push and cut but make a hanging connection to protect the cutting point - this also creates a small base, and white the one point jump (this is shown in illluck's 2nd dia.).
Note that white can still be attacked later, this group is pincered and even if it lives it is not worth much.
-
tj86430
- Gosei
- Posts: 1348
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:42 am
- Rank: FGA 7k GoR 1297
- GD Posts: 0
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Confused about an opening sequence
blade90 wrote:If you are a beginner then what you must really know is:
Black 'a' prevents white to dive into your corner, why is that important? There are 2 reasons:
1. Black secures most of the corner by playing a
2. If black closes the corner then white does not have a base yet + he still has a cutting point, in other words white is not alive and will come under attack.
You mean 'b' in the original diagram, not 'a', right?
Offending ad removed
-
Go_Japan
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 6:18 pm
- Rank: KGS 3-5k
- GD Posts: 0
- Location: Japan
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: Confused about an opening sequence
illluck wrote:White cannot play the cut. Black can play as below because white can only protect against one of a and b (I think the cut directly probably works too, but more complicated).
Thanks for this play B at 7. I learned something today.
-
Uberdude
- Judan
- Posts: 6727
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
- Rank: UK 4 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Uberdude 4d
- OGS: Uberdude 7d
- Location: Cambridge, UK
- Has thanked: 436 times
- Been thanked: 3718 times
Re: Confused about an opening sequence
As others have said, blocking in the corner is the key point to make eyes and territory for yourself, and deny the same to white. It is good that you considered black's weakness of white pushing through and cutting, and even better that you also saw white had a weakness (the cut at a in txpca's 2nd diagram. These weaknesses sort of cancel out and mean that black can handle the fight if white does cut. In white already had a stone which defended his cut, then blocking the corner would be much more dangerous as white's push and cut becomes much more powerful as he is not held back by his own weakness. This is a really common idea in Go.
Another general principle I would learn from this position is as follows. You should want to block the corner at b as, if it works, it gets you the most. But then you worry about white's cut. If you can read that white's cut results in your instant death the change your plan. But if you are not sure, play the possibly greedy move. It is better to ask for too much, and then learn why it is wrong, than to always play timidly.
Another general principle I would learn from this position is as follows. You should want to block the corner at b as, if it works, it gets you the most. But then you worry about white's cut. If you can read that white's cut results in your instant death the change your plan. But if you are not sure, play the possibly greedy move. It is better to ask for too much, and then learn why it is wrong, than to always play timidly.
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
Re: Confused about an opening sequence
Aside on the equivalence at the kyu level of influence and magic, or gobbledygook:
There are those of us who, even as beginners, wanted to be magicians. It is never too early to become a sorcerer's apprentice. Sure, disasters happen, but they happen, anyway. Better to get your feet wet than to say you cannot swim.
There are those of us who, even as beginners, wanted to be magicians.
It is never too early to become a sorcerer's apprentice. Sure, disasters happen, but they happen, anyway. Better to get your feet wet than to say you cannot swim.The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
-
txcpa
- Dies in gote
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:56 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Confused about an opening sequence
Great responses, everyone! I appreciate the analysis. I was wondering if bad shape might have been part of the problem, but I don't quite yet know enough to be able to clearly discern the differences between some shape concepts such as thickness vs. heaviness. I've read Volumes I-III in the Learn to Play Go series (and most of Volume IV), and most of Opening Theory Made Easy, so I'm familiar with such concepts (including the empty triangle), but I am not yet at the point of truly understanding why something is bad shape or good shape, but I guess that such intuition just comes with more experience. I'm continually amazed at the complexity of this game, and am very much enjoying my study of it.
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
Re: Confused about an opening sequence
illluck wrote:There are more difficult lines of resistance by white (e.g. an empty triangle to remove a liberty rather than connect - though here black's stone on the left side probably removes the danger), but overall the idea is that the cut does not work (though I'm not confident I'll play it correctly :p).
I added a couple of variations for that play.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
Re: Confused about an opening sequence
txcpa wrote:Great responses, everyone! I appreciate the analysis. I was wondering if bad shape might have been part of the problem, but I don't quite yet know enough to be able to clearly discern the differences between some shape concepts such as thickness vs. heaviness.
If you can fairly reliably distinguish thick from heavy and thin from light, you are strong for an amateur.
I've read Volumes I-III in the Learn to Play Go series (and most of Volume IV), and most of Opening Theory Made Easy, so I'm familiar with such concepts (including the empty triangle), but I am not yet at the point of truly understanding why something is bad shape or good shape, but I guess that such intuition just comes with more experience. I'm continually amazed at the complexity of this game, and am very much enjoying my study of it.
Shape is essentially about making your stones work together efficiently in a local region. Sometimes amateurs will say, oh, this is a good shape, with no consideration of the context. A shape that may be good to counter an opponent's threat may be inefficient if the opponent has no such threat.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
-
blade90
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:16 am
- Rank: KGS 2k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: blade90
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 11 times
Re: Confused about an opening sequence
tj86430 wrote:You mean 'b' in the original diagram, not 'a', right?
Yes I mean 'b', sorry if I confused txcpa
