$$Bcm1

3 |

2
$$ -----------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . , . . , 2 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 , . . , . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . , . . , . . . |
$$ | . . 4 . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ -----------------------------
- Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm1
3 |
2
$$ -----------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . , . . , 2 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 5 , . . , . . , . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . , . . , . . . |
$$ | . . 4 . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ -----------------------------[/go]
I have the theory that good Go players are also good at Loose, but I may be wrong. Strategy is similar, but tactics are different enough as to require a different approach.
Anyway, I rather meant that for some reason claiming non-consecutive corners seems riskier to me, a bit like chess games with cross castlings, if you know what I mean.
