jts wrote:gowan wrote:The term calculate is interesting in this context because the word comes from calculus which, in Latin, means stoneHowever, it also has a meaning of working with numbers, and I'd think in a go context it would refer to counting points or the value of moves rather than exploring the results of sequences of moves.
Yes, but in chess "to calculate" is a term of art for more or less what we would call "to read" in Go. That's certainly where it comes from in "Go and Go Moku"... Lasker, at least initially, uses chess terms for just about everything (tempo for sente, combination for sequence or tactic, man for stone).
Yes, we have to consider that the likely cause of the shift to "reading" was the translation of original source material from Japanese. See the use of 読み or ヨミ in book titles like:
三村智保の読みに強くなる秘訣 (NHK囲碁シリーズ)
実戦の読みを鍛える 玄妙 呉清源詰碁 (MYCOM囲碁ブックス)
加藤正夫3手のヨミ (布石) [単行本]
So to me there is nothing too interesting about the adoption of the term. However, this thread got me thinking (or worrying