L19 2011/2012 tournament: PAIRINGS and RESULTS
- lindentree
- Dies with sente
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:12 pm
- Rank: AGA 3 dan
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: lindentree
- Tygem: selendis
- IGS: lchiu87
- Wbaduk: lindentree
- Location: California
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 13 times
- Contact:
Re: L19 2011 tournament: PAIRINGS and RESULTS
Well, despite remarkably poor and careless play on my part, I somehow won against Marcus (who may have been a bit distracted at the time). Any comments or reviews would be greatly appreciated.
lindentree(W) vs. Marcus(B), W + 67.5
lindentree(W) vs. Marcus(B), W + 67.5
- Joaz Banbeck
- Judan
- Posts: 5546
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:30 am
- Rank: 1D AGA
- GD Posts: 1512
- Kaya handle: Test
- Location: Banbeck Vale
- Has thanked: 1080 times
- Been thanked: 1434 times
Re: L19 2011 tournament: PAIRINGS and RESULTS
18: This feels small. There are three other corners, so there must be something bigger. I'd leave the aji.
22-26: I like white's choice of joseki. The usual continuation is for black to play 27 somewhere around the side star point stone to attack C12. Because of white's position on the lower left side, that may not be to practical for black. OTOH, if black does tenuki, a future white play around there grabs easy territory and leaves black feeling a bit unsettled.
28: As with 18, it feels small. White has spent two moves turning a 0-point group into a 3-point group. Not a good investment of two stones at this temperature, IMO. Black could press down with E7 - in sente - and most of the benefit of K4 is gone.
96: If black exploits the weaknesses at D7, H16 and F17, he should live easily. Then you have two weak groups and L8 is a monster.
98: How were you planning on responding if black had noticed F17?
122: You don't have time for this. It separates two groups that are almost impossible to kill, and it is gote. Meanwhile, you have two eyeless groups that need help. How about O14 instead? If black had played just a bit more aggressively ( Q9 instead of O9, or maybe a hane at N14 ) you would have been toast.
Even after you manage to connect by killing K8/L8/M8, your upper right group still should have died. Black made it more difficult for himself to kill you around move 200, then gave up the kill-with-a-ko by not playing 249 at R13.
If Marcus polishes his attacking technique just a bit, he will crush you when you keep leaving groups hanging like this.
22-26: I like white's choice of joseki. The usual continuation is for black to play 27 somewhere around the side star point stone to attack C12. Because of white's position on the lower left side, that may not be to practical for black. OTOH, if black does tenuki, a future white play around there grabs easy territory and leaves black feeling a bit unsettled.
28: As with 18, it feels small. White has spent two moves turning a 0-point group into a 3-point group. Not a good investment of two stones at this temperature, IMO. Black could press down with E7 - in sente - and most of the benefit of K4 is gone.
96: If black exploits the weaknesses at D7, H16 and F17, he should live easily. Then you have two weak groups and L8 is a monster.
98: How were you planning on responding if black had noticed F17?
122: You don't have time for this. It separates two groups that are almost impossible to kill, and it is gote. Meanwhile, you have two eyeless groups that need help. How about O14 instead? If black had played just a bit more aggressively ( Q9 instead of O9, or maybe a hane at N14 ) you would have been toast.
Even after you manage to connect by killing K8/L8/M8, your upper right group still should have died. Black made it more difficult for himself to kill you around move 200, then gave up the kill-with-a-ko by not playing 249 at R13.
If Marcus polishes his attacking technique just a bit, he will crush you when you keep leaving groups hanging like this.
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207
- jts
- Oza
- Posts: 2670
- Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:17 pm
- Rank: kgs 6k
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 310 times
- Been thanked: 636 times
Re: L19 2011 tournament: PAIRINGS and RESULTS
I thought about this for a while. It was a helpful analytical tool, even if I didn't reach an "Aha, it's obvious!" moment. The difficult point, to me, is that while clearly the stone at D10 is worth more than Q5 (not that Q5 was a mistake, but it served its purpose by allowing me to settle the corner), the aji of Q5 can be neatly wiped off the board in a single move, while D10 will still have aji even after I add a stone locally. Or, put a third way: if neither stone were on the board, it looks to me like d10 would still be a good play for white, even though I would be able to defend immediately, while q5 would be a dense play for black.Joaz Banbeck wrote: "Let's each take one stone off of the board and toss it back in the bowl. I'll remove mine at Q5; you remove yours at D10."
Ignoring for the moment why black would make such a bizarre offer, and also ignoring the issue of whether or not it is legal, should white accept?
I guess what I'm trying to say is that d10 is a valuable stone with cool local follow-ups, and q5 is a worthless stone with hot local follow-ups.
But maybe I'm talking myself in circles.
- f4223n354
- Dies in gote
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 9:55 pm
- Rank: FII 3 kyu KGS 4 kyu
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: f4223n354
- IGS: f4223n354
- Wbaduk: f4223n354
- Location: south jakarta
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: L19 2011 tournament: PAIRINGS and RESULTS
have anyone seen aphelion around?
we haven't scheduled our game...
i think around 1 week ago he/she leave a message via kgs asking when i have time...
i already replied via kgs n via l19 pm but haven't got reply from him...
do any1 know his fb or some other social network so i can contact him...?
thanks
we haven't scheduled our game...
i think around 1 week ago he/she leave a message via kgs asking when i have time...
i already replied via kgs n via l19 pm but haven't got reply from him...
do any1 know his fb or some other social network so i can contact him...?
thanks
- Joaz Banbeck
- Judan
- Posts: 5546
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:30 am
- Rank: 1D AGA
- GD Posts: 1512
- Kaya handle: Test
- Location: Banbeck Vale
- Has thanked: 1080 times
- Been thanked: 1434 times
Re: L19 2011 tournament: PAIRINGS and RESULTS
Also, does anyone know how to contact Kivi ( aka Kodomo on KGS )? He hasn't been on either site in weeks.
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207
- Joaz Banbeck
- Judan
- Posts: 5546
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:30 am
- Rank: 1D AGA
- GD Posts: 1512
- Kaya handle: Test
- Location: Banbeck Vale
- Has thanked: 1080 times
- Been thanked: 1434 times
Re: L19 2011 tournament: PAIRINGS and RESULTS
[Admin] NOTICE TO ALL PLAYERS: FOURTH ROUND PAIRINGS HAVE BEEN UP FOR MORE THAN TWO WEEKS. TO AVOID A FORFEIT, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR OPPONENT. IF YOU CAN'T CONTACT YOUR OPPONENT, PM ME. [/Admin]
Help make L19 more organized. Make an index: https://lifein19x19.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=5207
- CSamurai
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Fri May 28, 2010 2:50 am
- Rank: KGS4k
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: CSamurai
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 31 times
Re: L19 2011 tournament: PAIRINGS and RESULTS
TJ and I are tentatively scheduled for 8 AM EST, Friday the 11th (that is this friday.)
Sorry for the slow.
CSam
Sorry for the slow.
CSam
- Redundant
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 924
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 3:00 pm
- Rank: lazy
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: redundant/silchas
- Tygem: redundant
- Wbaduk: redundant
- DGS: redundant
- OGS: redundant
- Location: Pittsburgh
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 103 times
Re: L19 2011 tournament: PAIRINGS and RESULTS
It was an interesting game, and I defeated Lorill by resign.
-
tj86430
- Gosei
- Posts: 1348
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:42 am
- Rank: FGA 7k GoR 1297
- GD Posts: 0
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: L19 2011 tournament: PAIRINGS and RESULTS
I think we have a problem. You said EST is GMT-4, but all sources say that it is GMT-5. Therefore our game, that was scheduled to start at 2pm GMT+2, and should start in 36 minutes, is according to my calculations 7 AM EST and not 8 AM EST.CSamurai wrote:TJ and I are tentatively scheduled for 8 AM EST, Friday the 11th (that is this friday.)
Sorry for the slow.
CSam
Well, we'll soon find out.
Offending ad removed
-
crux
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 6:42 am
- Rank: IGS 2d+
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: venkman, M2Brett1
- Has thanked: 35 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Re: L19 2011 tournament: PAIRINGS and RESULTS
Araban wrote: http://ywchoe.com/L19.html
Laman wrote:here is beta version of alternative tournament bracket
I think it's a pity that all of these are defunct now.HermanHiddema wrote:...
http://hiddema.nl/l19.html
-
tj86430
- Gosei
- Posts: 1348
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:42 am
- Rank: FGA 7k GoR 1297
- GD Posts: 0
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: L19 2011 tournament: PAIRINGS and RESULTS
Apparently I was right, and CSamurai's timezone is indeed GMT-5 and not GMT-4.tj86430 wrote:I think we have a problem. You said EST is GMT-4, but all sources say that it is GMT-5. Therefore our game, that was scheduled to start at 2pm GMT+2, and should start in 36 minutes, is according to my calculations 7 AM EST and not 8 AM EST.CSamurai wrote:TJ and I are tentatively scheduled for 8 AM EST, Friday the 11th (that is this friday.)
Sorry for the slow.
CSam
Well, we'll soon find out.
Offending ad removed