No need to fuss, I just thought I'd suggest something that might be an improvement to what is a very nice competition as it is.topazg wrote:Must admit, I'm not too fussed either way - I'm just glad that Araban is hosting a fun competition
Strength Analysis Experiment v2 - w/ prize!
-
tj86430
- Gosei
- Posts: 1348
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:42 am
- Rank: FGA 7k GoR 1297
- GD Posts: 0
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Strength Analysis Experiment v2 - w/ prize!
Offending ad removed
- Jonas
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 1:36 am
- Rank: EGF 1d WBaduk 4d
- GD Posts: 0
- Location: Osnabrück, Germany
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
- Contact:
Re: Strength Analysis Experiment v2 - w/ prize!
Hmmm what's the time in US? 6 am? Sol we NEED the solution ^_^
-
Violence
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 754
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:12 am
- Rank: Something Dan
- GD Posts: 720
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 144 times
Re: Strength Analysis Experiment v2 - w/ prize!
Attempting now, I'll just edit this post with my answers.
Alright...
Man... not confident about any of my answers...
Edit: What? It wasn't by 10 am? Man, I woke up early for nothing... I'd better win some of Solch's money now!
Alright...
Edit: What? It wasn't by 10 am? Man, I woke up early for nothing... I'd better win some of Solch's money now!
- Solomon
- Gosei
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:21 pm
- Rank: AGA 5d
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Capsule 4d
- Tygem: 치킨까스 5d
- Location: Bellevue, WA
- Has thanked: 90 times
- Been thanked: 835 times
Re: Strength Analysis Experiment v2 - w/ prize!
Wow, I am very surprised by the number of responses that came up in this thread. I guess people enjoy it more than I thought
. Overall it looks like people did pretty well (well...nice try Chew Terr!
). I was especially amused by Magicwand's comment that he vowed no games were played by professionals
. Liu Xing's games tend to be strange like that. It was a bit of a downer someone sourced one of the games, but meh it was expected and no one gets disqualified.
That said, congratulations to adoreme for getting the highest with 37/40
. I'm pretty sure your KGS handle is the same as your L19 handle, but assumptions have killed me in the past so if you could just verify for me that it is indeed your KGS handle, then let me know and I'll KGS+ it (or if you have another account that you'd like me to gift it to, that works as well). If I made any arithmetic error, let me know so I can edit it!
Thanks again everyone for participating, it was fun reading all the answers and analysis!
I'll do one again in the future with an even better prize.
Scores:
Chew Terr: 0 (0, 0, 0, 0)
Magicwand: 14 (7, 0, 6, 1)
Kirby: 14 (9, 0, 5, 0)
tj86430: 17 (7, 2, 8, 0)
Biondy: 13 (8, 0, 3, 2)
topazg: 29 (10, 10, 9, 0)
Tryphon: 22 (9, 7, 5, 1)
adoreme: 37 (9, 10, 8, 10)
Jonas: 28 (8, 4, 6, 10)
zinger: 28 (7, 10, 9, 1)
nami: 18 (9, 3, 6, 0)
Gene: 30 (9, 5, 6, 10)
daniel_the_smith: 28 (6, 10, 5, 7)
RedStick: 21 (7, 4, 0, 10)
emeraldemon: 19 (8, 5, 6, 0)
Stable: 33 (8, 7, 8, 10)
Marcus: 31 (10, 6, 5, 10)
Rafa: 22 (6, 4, 6, 6)
gaius: 15 (5, 3, 7, 0)
SoDesuNe: 17 (7, 0, 10, 0)
Harleqin: 33 (9, 8, 10, 6)
Suji: 17 (8, 4, 5, 0)
Dusk Eagle: 29 (8, 3, 8, 10)
Nikolas73: 24 (4, 10, 10, 0)
wossname: 35 (7, 10, 9, 9)
rubin427: 20 (0, 10, 10, 0)
Darrell: 23 (3, 0, 10, 10)
ketchup: 20 (4, 10, 6, 0)
fwiffo: 21 (9, 4, 7, 1)
freegame: 35 (8, 8, 9, 10)
odnihs: 35 (9, 7, 9, 10)
runaway: 24 (9, 0, 8, 7)
Violence: 30 (8, 6, 6, 10)
kokomi: 20 (10, 5, 5, 0)
Solutions:
That said, congratulations to adoreme for getting the highest with 37/40
Thanks again everyone for participating, it was fun reading all the answers and analysis!
Scores:
Chew Terr: 0 (0, 0, 0, 0)
Magicwand: 14 (7, 0, 6, 1)
Kirby: 14 (9, 0, 5, 0)
tj86430: 17 (7, 2, 8, 0)
Biondy: 13 (8, 0, 3, 2)
topazg: 29 (10, 10, 9, 0)
Tryphon: 22 (9, 7, 5, 1)
adoreme: 37 (9, 10, 8, 10)
Jonas: 28 (8, 4, 6, 10)
zinger: 28 (7, 10, 9, 1)
nami: 18 (9, 3, 6, 0)
Gene: 30 (9, 5, 6, 10)
daniel_the_smith: 28 (6, 10, 5, 7)
RedStick: 21 (7, 4, 0, 10)
emeraldemon: 19 (8, 5, 6, 0)
Stable: 33 (8, 7, 8, 10)
Marcus: 31 (10, 6, 5, 10)
Rafa: 22 (6, 4, 6, 6)
gaius: 15 (5, 3, 7, 0)
SoDesuNe: 17 (7, 0, 10, 0)
Harleqin: 33 (9, 8, 10, 6)
Suji: 17 (8, 4, 5, 0)
Dusk Eagle: 29 (8, 3, 8, 10)
Nikolas73: 24 (4, 10, 10, 0)
wossname: 35 (7, 10, 9, 9)
rubin427: 20 (0, 10, 10, 0)
Darrell: 23 (3, 0, 10, 10)
ketchup: 20 (4, 10, 6, 0)
fwiffo: 21 (9, 4, 7, 1)
freegame: 35 (8, 8, 9, 10)
odnihs: 35 (9, 7, 9, 10)
runaway: 24 (9, 0, 8, 7)
Violence: 30 (8, 6, 6, 10)
kokomi: 20 (10, 5, 5, 0)
Solutions:
- Chew Terr
- Gosei
- Posts: 2060
- Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 12:45 pm
- Rank: KGS 3k
- GD Posts: 264
- KGS: Chew
- Location: Texas
- Has thanked: 546 times
- Been thanked: 172 times
- Contact:
Re: Strength Analysis Experiment v2 - w/ prize!
I am INVINCIBLE! Seriously though, thanks, Araban. Fun game, even if it's not my forte. =DAraban wrote:(well...nice try Chew Terr!
Someday I want to be strong enough to earn KGS[-].
- daniel_the_smith
- Gosei
- Posts: 2116
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:51 am
- Rank: 2d AGA
- GD Posts: 1193
- KGS: lavalamp
- Tygem: imapenguin
- IGS: lavalamp
- OGS: daniel_the_smith
- Location: Silicon Valley
- Has thanked: 152 times
- Been thanked: 330 times
- Contact:
Re: Strength Analysis Experiment v2 - w/ prize!
My reasoning for the third game being was that it looked like one of my games, but I thought I was a little better than them. 
That which can be destroyed by the truth should be.
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com
--
My (sadly neglected, but not forgotten) project: http://dailyjoseki.com
-
Marcus
- Gosei
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:51 am
- GD Posts: 209
- KGS: Marcus316
- Has thanked: 139 times
- Been thanked: 111 times
Re: Strength Analysis Experiment v2 - w/ prize!
Wow, I was a lot closer than I thought I'd be. Got the first game dead on.
Second game was quite strong, so I'm not surprised I couldn't tell it was actually a pro game, though I did feel like it was really strong.
Congrats, adoreme!
Congrats, adoreme!
Yeah, I rated it the same as you, because it only felt slightly stronger than I am. Game 3 was the biggest surprise for me.daniel_the_smith wrote:My reasoning for the third game beingwas that it looked like one of my games, but I thought I was a little better than them.
- topazg
- Tengen
- Posts: 4511
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:08 am
- Rank: Nebulous
- GD Posts: 918
- KGS: topazg
- Location: Chatteris, UK
- Has thanked: 1579 times
- Been thanked: 650 times
- Contact:
Re: Strength Analysis Experiment v2 - w/ prize!
Gah, if only I'd known that game beforehand!!topazg: 29 (10, 10, 9, 0)
Seriously though, I now need to think why I treated that game as such a blind spot ... what a fun experiment, me wants another one!
-
adoreme
- Dies in gote
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:12 am
- Rank: 99kyu
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Strength Analysis Experiment v2 - w/ prize!
Thank you,
I never thought I was this close to the solution. Yes My KGS username is also adoreme there.
The last game was very interesting only the last move dying like that was very strange but always remember Nakano's God hand:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qt1FvPxmmfE
Even pros play self-atari sometimes. ^^
I never thought I was this close to the solution. Yes My KGS username is also adoreme there.
The last game was very interesting only the last move dying like that was very strange but always remember Nakano's God hand:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qt1FvPxmmfE
Even pros play self-atari sometimes. ^^
Human beings cannot stop doing what they really desire to do. ; Amamiya-sensei
Updated revised and continued Blog with Pro games commented and info about studying abroad: http://beginningpath.blogspot.com/
Updated revised and continued Blog with Pro games commented and info about studying abroad: http://beginningpath.blogspot.com/
- Solomon
- Gosei
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:21 pm
- Rank: AGA 5d
- GD Posts: 0
- KGS: Capsule 4d
- Tygem: 치킨까스 5d
- Location: Bellevue, WA
- Has thanked: 90 times
- Been thanked: 835 times
Re: Strength Analysis Experiment v2 - w/ prize!
Okay, sent it to you - hope you enjoy itadoreme wrote:Thank you,
I never thought I was this close to the solution. Yes My KGS username is also adoreme there.
The last game was very interesting only the last move dying like that was very strange but always remember Nakano's God hand:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qt1FvPxmmfE
Even pros play self-atari sometimes. ^^
-
adoreme
- Dies in gote
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:12 am
- Rank: 99kyu
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Strength Analysis Experiment v2 - w/ prize!
Thanks!
Human beings cannot stop doing what they really desire to do. ; Amamiya-sensei
Updated revised and continued Blog with Pro games commented and info about studying abroad: http://beginningpath.blogspot.com/
Updated revised and continued Blog with Pro games commented and info about studying abroad: http://beginningpath.blogspot.com/
-
tj86430
- Gosei
- Posts: 1348
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:42 am
- Rank: FGA 7k GoR 1297
- GD Posts: 0
- Location: Finland
- Has thanked: 49 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
Re: Strength Analysis Experiment v2 - w/ prize!
I did some statistical analysis of the results. I noted some minor issues:
Firstly, either zingers individual scores or the sum is incorrect, since 7+10+9+1 = 27.
Secondly, how does one get points if the correct answer is pro? pro gives obviously ten points, but is 9d = 9points etc? If that is the case I believe there are some errors in points.
Anyhow, assuming that individual scores are correct, here are the overall results in descending order of points:
adoreme: 37 (9, 10, 8, 10)
wossname: 35 (7, 10, 9, 9)
freegame: 35 (8, 8, 9, 10)
odnihs: 35 (9, 7, 9, 10)
Stable: 33 (8, 7, 8, 10)
Harleqin: 33 (9, 8, 10, 6)
Marcus: 31 (10, 6, 5, 10)
Gene: 30 (9, 5, 6, 10)
Violence: 30 (8, 6, 6, 10)
topazg: 29 (10, 10, 9, 0)
Dusk Eagle: 29 (8, 3, 8, 10)
Jonas: 28 (8, 4, 6, 10)
daniel_the_smith: 28 (6, 10, 5, 7)
Zinger: 27 (7, 10, 9, 1)
Nikolas73: 24 (4, 10, 10, 0)
runaway: 24 (9, 0, 8, 7)
Darrell: 23 (3, 0, 10, 10)
Tryphon: 22 (9, 7, 5, 1)
Rafa: 22 (6, 4, 6, 6)
RedStick: 21 (7, 4, 0, 10)
fwiffo: 21 (9, 4, 7, 1)
rubin427: 20 (0, 10, 10, 0)
ketchup: 20 (4, 10, 6, 0)
kokomi: 20 (10, 5, 5, 0)
emeraldemon: 19 (8, 5, 6, 0)
nami: 18 (9, 3, 6, 0)
tj86430: 17 (7, 2, 8, 0)
SoDesuNe: 17 (7, 0, 10, 0)
Suji: 17 (8, 4, 5, 0)
gaius: 15 (5, 3, 7, 0)
Magicwand: 14 (7, 0, 6, 1)
Kirby: 14 (9, 0, 5, 0)
Biondy: 13 (8, 0, 3, 2)
Chew Terr: 0 (0, 0, 0, 0)
(personally I'm very proud that I didn't finish last, and that did better than e.g. Magicwand and Kirby)
The average scores of each question were:
1: 7.21
2: 5.15
3: 6.76
4: 4.44
The standard deviation for each question:
1: 2.51
2: 3.62
3: 2.55
4: 4.57 (almost everyone got either 0/1 or 9/10)
Firstly, either zingers individual scores or the sum is incorrect, since 7+10+9+1 = 27.
Secondly, how does one get points if the correct answer is pro? pro gives obviously ten points, but is 9d = 9points etc? If that is the case I believe there are some errors in points.
Anyhow, assuming that individual scores are correct, here are the overall results in descending order of points:
adoreme: 37 (9, 10, 8, 10)
wossname: 35 (7, 10, 9, 9)
freegame: 35 (8, 8, 9, 10)
odnihs: 35 (9, 7, 9, 10)
Stable: 33 (8, 7, 8, 10)
Harleqin: 33 (9, 8, 10, 6)
Marcus: 31 (10, 6, 5, 10)
Gene: 30 (9, 5, 6, 10)
Violence: 30 (8, 6, 6, 10)
topazg: 29 (10, 10, 9, 0)
Dusk Eagle: 29 (8, 3, 8, 10)
Jonas: 28 (8, 4, 6, 10)
daniel_the_smith: 28 (6, 10, 5, 7)
Zinger: 27 (7, 10, 9, 1)
Nikolas73: 24 (4, 10, 10, 0)
runaway: 24 (9, 0, 8, 7)
Darrell: 23 (3, 0, 10, 10)
Tryphon: 22 (9, 7, 5, 1)
Rafa: 22 (6, 4, 6, 6)
RedStick: 21 (7, 4, 0, 10)
fwiffo: 21 (9, 4, 7, 1)
rubin427: 20 (0, 10, 10, 0)
ketchup: 20 (4, 10, 6, 0)
kokomi: 20 (10, 5, 5, 0)
emeraldemon: 19 (8, 5, 6, 0)
nami: 18 (9, 3, 6, 0)
tj86430: 17 (7, 2, 8, 0)
SoDesuNe: 17 (7, 0, 10, 0)
Suji: 17 (8, 4, 5, 0)
gaius: 15 (5, 3, 7, 0)
Magicwand: 14 (7, 0, 6, 1)
Kirby: 14 (9, 0, 5, 0)
Biondy: 13 (8, 0, 3, 2)
Chew Terr: 0 (0, 0, 0, 0)
(personally I'm very proud that I didn't finish last, and that did better than e.g. Magicwand and Kirby)
The average scores of each question were:
1: 7.21
2: 5.15
3: 6.76
4: 4.44
The standard deviation for each question:
1: 2.51
2: 3.62
3: 2.55
4: 4.57 (almost everyone got either 0/1 or 9/10)
Offending ad removed