I'm 4k on KGS right now. I've got a high (~70%) win rate against players my own rank or lower, but I've got a much lower (~40%) win rate against players with a higher rank. Here's a recent loss. While this is worse than some, the way I let myself end up with several weak groups on the board is fairly typical. I've made some comments about moves I thought were bad (45 and 69 were particularly egregious), but I'd appreciate any insight you might have.
Typical Loss (4k vs 3k)
- EdLee
- Honinbo
- Posts: 8859
- Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
- GD Posts: 312
- Location: Santa Barbara, CA
- Has thanked: 349 times
- Been thanked: 2070 times
Hi jeromie,
Did you consider P16 ?
( Not saying one is better than the other; just curious if you thought about fighting here. )
( same question as
)
I like the game move better.
If you block on top, seems unclear what you gain.
Seems OK, but...
...maybe not so good. J6 ?
Strange ? Locally, why not R12 ?
( Globally, H3? )
Not so big ? W still has R13 or Q10.
C5 aji for B sitting there since
.
Unclear what you gain by pushing up. C10 seems natural.
Problem could be
missing C10.
B12.
Watch out for
B12...
B12...
..
You help W so much.
N16 bigger ?
( Not saying one is better than the other; just curious if you thought about fighting here. )
If you block on top, seems unclear what you gain.
( Globally, H3? )
C5 aji for B sitting there since
-
bayu
- Lives with ko
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:33 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 32 times
Re: Typical Loss (4k vs 3k)
Sniped by Ed. No overlap in the moves we critisize. The kyu-world is a big place 
To me it looks like you got outsmarted in the influence department.
At the beginning, the lower side was the one where you put most stones. But you got hardly anything in return, when your opponent invaded. I'd try to deny him a base and chase it. The right side then might become natural territory and you get some influence to wreck his sides. That would have been my gameplan at :24:
I don't like this move. Looks out of balance. With the high stone at k4 white can still come in.
why??? In the end it led to squeezing toothpaste.
Why not jump to o8? Or tenuki. I think it is now important to have a plan for the d6-h6 line. If these stones amass influence, your c11 stone gets lonely. Might be time to get a base with it now.
To me it looks like you got outsmarted in the influence department.
At the beginning, the lower side was the one where you put most stones. But you got hardly anything in return, when your opponent invaded. I'd try to deny him a base and chase it. The right side then might become natural territory and you get some influence to wreck his sides. That would have been my gameplan at :24:
If something sank it might be a treasure. And 2kyu advice is not necessarily Dan repertoire..
-
jeromie
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 7:12 pm
- Rank: AGA 3k
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: jeromie
- Location: Fort Collins, CO
- Has thanked: 319 times
- Been thanked: 287 times
Re: Typical Loss (4k vs 3k)
Thanks for the feedback!
Ed:
No, I didn't consider P16. I can be overly passive in the opening, so that's a good move for me to keep in mind.
I tend to be unclear about when I should block on the 3rd line vs push up versus a shoulder hit. The push up is my default response, but you're right that it didn't work so well here.
This is the kind of move that I frequently miss - a move that seems slow at first glance, but it settles a weak group and gives me more power to attack. Thank you!
(and following) Yeah, this sequence didn't work out at all as I envisioned. It's the result of poor reading on my part.
bayu:
Thanks. Definitely something I didn't see in my own review.
Since I had the possibility of capturing a stone on either side, I was hoping to leave white with a weak shape that I could attack for profit. The center didn't belong to anyone, so I didn't think I was pushing white into my territory (which is what I associate with squeezing toothpaste). But when I let my bottom get weak, white got too much outside influence and this didn't work very well. In retrospect, the hane may have been better.
Yes, this move was too slow and didn't have much impact on the game. Thanks!
Ed:
bayu:
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
Re: Typical Loss (4k vs 3k)
A few comments. 
Main focus: Divide and conquer!
Main focus: Divide and conquer!
Last edited by Bill Spight on Sat Jun 24, 2017 2:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
-
jeromie
- Lives in sente
- Posts: 902
- Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 7:12 pm
- Rank: AGA 3k
- GD Posts: 0
- Universal go server handle: jeromie
- Location: Fort Collins, CO
- Has thanked: 319 times
- Been thanked: 287 times
Re: Typical Loss (4k vs 3k)
Thanks, Bill. Your suggestions look natural when someone else points them out. 
-
Bill Spight
- Honinbo
- Posts: 10905
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
- Has thanked: 3651 times
- Been thanked: 3373 times
Re: Typical Loss (4k vs 3k)
Well, I goofed in the variation forjeromie wrote:Thanks, Bill. Your suggestions look natural when someone else points them out.
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins
Visualize whirled peas.
Everything with love. Stay safe.