Attack & defense by Ishida and Davies reviewed with KataGo 1

For lessons, as well as threads about specific moves, and anything else worth studying.
Post Reply
User avatar
Knotwilg
Oza
Posts: 2432
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 6:53 am
Rank: KGS 2d OGS 1d Fox 4d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Artevelde
OGS: Knotwilg
Online playing schedule: UTC 18:00 - 22:00
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Has thanked: 360 times
Been thanked: 1021 times
Contact:

Attack & defense by Ishida and Davies reviewed with KataGo 1

Post by Knotwilg »

Here's an analysis of the first full board diagram discussion in Ishida & Davies' "Attack and Defense"

Schachus
Lives with ko
Posts: 211
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2015 11:02 am
Rank: KGS 1k EGF 2k
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Schachus12
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Attack & defense by Ishida and Davies reviewed with Kata

Post by Schachus »

what komi did you use for katago/ what komi does this game have? I`m surprised black is supposed to be clearly ahead (unless it`s 0 komi then it doesnt surprise me).
User avatar
Knotwilg
Oza
Posts: 2432
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 6:53 am
Rank: KGS 2d OGS 1d Fox 4d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Artevelde
OGS: Knotwilg
Online playing schedule: UTC 18:00 - 22:00
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Has thanked: 360 times
Been thanked: 1021 times
Contact:

Re: Attack & defense by Ishida and Davies reviewed with Kata

Post by Knotwilg »

Schachus wrote:what komi did you use for katago/ what komi does this game have? I`m surprised black is supposed to be clearly ahead (unless it`s 0 komi then it doesnt surprise me).
Me too I was surprised ... I used a 6,5 point komi.

To test whether my version of KataGo takes it into account, I changed komi to 0,5 ... and KataGo gives Black a 14 pt advantage. If it were strictly additive it should give 12 points but this shows it takes komi into account.

Edit: I also made two other changes to test the evaluation

1) I moved White's lower left 3-3 stone to 4-4. That seems to reduce Black's advantage from 6 to 4,5 (with error margins)
2) I replaced the upper left with (what used to be) the standard line of the large avalanche outward turn. That further reduces the advantage to 3,5. See below



Maybe having solid influence towards the opponent's lone corner is giving an advantage, if we compare both assessments.

As this wasn't the theme of this post I won't further investigate this now but if someone has a view on which effects compound into such a big lead early on, I'm also interested.
Post Reply