thequietcenter (9k) vs iridium (3k) - review my review

Post your games here for other members to critique your play.
Post Reply
thequietcenter
Dies with sente
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 12:55 pm
Rank: 9k
GD Posts: 0
OGS: thequietcenter
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 2 times

thequietcenter (9k) vs iridium (3k) - review my review

Post by thequietcenter »

Hello, I played as Black and lost this game. I would appreciate a review of my review:

https://online-go.com/review/862301
My OGS profile is https://online-go.com/user/view/1084709
My twitch stream is https://www.twitch.tv/thedeepself
My flashcard software for baduk is www.may69.com/flash-goban
User avatar
CDavis7M
Lives in sente
Posts: 716
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 2:18 pm
Rank: Shokyu
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: CDavis7M
Has thanked: 109 times
Been thanked: 140 times
Contact:

Re: thequietcenter (9k) vs iridium (3k) - review my review

Post by CDavis7M »

Well played. Though I suspected it was a correspondence game and it was. If you and your opponents have accurate ranks you did well, especially for correspondence.

There is a comment on Move 34 about an invasion. It can't be as deep as 'a' at that point in the game because White would simply cap at 'b' and already have supporting stones on both sides.

Back to move 31, Black induced white to become stronger. Black's group on the top (being extended from) was fine.

Black made 6 points of territory in exchange for giving White ~15? points of fairly secure territory. And white has more potential to develop I think.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Moves 31 to 34. Point 'A' marked in the OGS commentary.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X . . O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . X , X . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X C C |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C C |
$$ | . . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . 3 C C |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . 4 , O 2 . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C C C . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C C C . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . b C a C C |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . C C C . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C C . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . O . . O O O . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . . O X X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . X X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
This doesn't really work at this point. You need more stones or better if this is played BEFORE move 31. After the exchanges, I worry about White being able to kill the corner. At least White will attack the bottom side. And even beyond that, Black is going to be in trouble. I think Black would regret this invasion. This just points to why 31 was bad to me.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B A bad idea
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X . . O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . X , X . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . O 2 O O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . O . . O O O 4 . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . . O X X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . X X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Maybe :b3: , or abc, I don't know. Still doesn't seem good. Maybe best to just start with 3.
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X . . O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . X , X . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a 3 . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . c b . 1 . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . O . . O O O 2 . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . . O X X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . X X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
User avatar
Harleqin
Lives in sente
Posts: 921
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:31 am
Rank: German 2 dan
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 401 times
Been thanked: 164 times

Re: thequietcenter (9k) vs iridium (3k) - review my review

Post by Harleqin »

I think that's too hard. I'd want to extend to :b5: as black, at some point. I think something like this is enough:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X . . O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . X , X . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . 2 O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . O . . O O O . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . . O X X 5 . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . X X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
A good system naturally covers all corner cases without further effort.
User avatar
Knotwilg
Oza
Posts: 2432
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 6:53 am
Rank: KGS 2d OGS 1d Fox 4d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Artevelde
OGS: Knotwilg
Online playing schedule: UTC 18:00 - 22:00
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Has thanked: 360 times
Been thanked: 1021 times
Contact:

Re: thequietcenter (9k) vs iridium (3k) - review my review

Post by Knotwilg »

Agree with Harleqin on :b1: On :b5: I would continue and turn with the reducing stones, not to lose control over the center.

KataGo wants to cut through the elephant's eye at :b5: which is a more active way of affecting the center I guess

In any case Harleqin's :b5: looks more like an endgame move, as Black can still extend along the bottom for life.
User avatar
Harleqin
Lives in sente
Posts: 921
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 10:31 am
Rank: German 2 dan
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 401 times
Been thanked: 164 times

Re: thequietcenter (9k) vs iridium (3k) - review my review

Post by Harleqin »

Knotwilg wrote: In any case Harleqin's :b5: looks more like an endgame move, as Black can still extend along the bottom for life.
I don't think of it as endgame or defensive, it also seems to affect the stability of the white group(s). I am thinking of something like this (please disregard the exact position of the example white stone on the left):
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ---------------------------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O O X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . X . . O . . O . . X . . |
$$ | . . X , X . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O , . . . . . , . . . . . O O . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . , . O a . O O O . . |
$$ | . . O . . X . . X . . . . . O X X X . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . X X . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ ---------------------------------------[/go]
A good system naturally covers all corner cases without further effort.
Post Reply