Code: Select all
\n
The only way to do this is to set the width of the surrounding div to slightly more than the width of the image. You could use javascript for it, but there is no pure css way to create what they call a "shrink wrap" effect.Kirby wrote: I would like to force line wrapping if the comment text is of greater width than the image itself. I'm still thinking about how to do this, though, since the images are created on the fly.
The width of the image is the variable I want to get at. As you know, the image is generated within the div on-the-fly from php, so I am not sure if information about the width of the image is available at the time that the div is constructed.HermanHiddema wrote: The only way to do this is to set the width of the surrounding div to slightly more than the width of the image. You could use javascript for it, but there is no pure css way to create what they call a "shrink wrap" effect.
After page load, you could probably find the width of the img element and set the width of the surrounding div then.Kirby wrote:The width of the image is the variable I want to get at. As you know, the image is generated within the div on-the-fly from php, so I am not sure if information about the width of the image is available at the time that the div is constructed.HermanHiddema wrote: The only way to do this is to set the width of the surrounding div to slightly more than the width of the image. You could use javascript for it, but there is no pure css way to create what they call a "shrink wrap" effect.
Is this inaccurate?
No problem. I will still try to implement the "auto-wrapping" when the text extends the image width, but even then, I think I will leave the line break functionality in so that people can leave linebreaks at arbitrary locations.Joaz Banbeck wrote:Thanks, Kirby. I had been intending to request that.
Is it that big of a deal? At least on my (KDE Linux, Firefox) system, when you copy an image as you copy text, the alternate text gets copied in the images' place. Since the alt-text of a smiley is the code to make that smiley, it copies seamlessly. Is that not the case on some OS or browser?Kirby wrote:The other issue I am pondering with the diagrams is the "Show Diagram Code" text that includes smileys. When we get the text for processing go diagrams, smileys have already been substituted in so the smileys show up in the code text. I'm trying to think of an easier way to show the original diagram code than manually parsing all of the text for every smiley we've added.
