vash3g wrote:
To semi quote a couple of board members when asked about long term plans "every one has a long term goal, theres about 40 of them".
daniel_the_smith wrote:Maybe it would be worth attempting to have the board make an official statement on the matter? It seems like a relatively common criticism, that the AGA has no direction/changes its mind frequently/etc.
Truthfully I don't think any of the AGA people long term goals; they have dreams. An American professional system, tournament sponsorship, more volunteers than they can shake a stick at, etc. These don't count.
Serious planning means scoping out what you want, and how you intend to get there.
Let me share with you my last experience with the AGA, when I was doing the ratings. I had conveyed my intention to move on, but that date was still a few months away and there was time to start and finish one more significant project. I knew that a rank certificate program had been on the AGA's radar for a very long time, and had been told that it was a priority. It was a regarded as a potential revenue generator for the AGA--they had visions of being able to charge a fee (nominal or otherwise) for the certificates.
I had already put in some work sketching out the system, and had a basic one that worked pretty well already. It needed fleshing out, but there was plenty of time for that before I finished off.
I went back and told them that, yes, this could be done in short order. But in order to do it, we would need an electronic certificate template and a programmer who could write merge a person's name and rank information into the template. With that was in place, I could write all the back-end code that would do the statistical calculations and figure out who was eligible for which rank certificate. The timeframe for finishing this was a couple of months.
Now ask yourself, how hard would it be to find a certificate template and a programmer in the AGA community? Programmers are pretty common, especially for time-limited programming like this. If the AGA has no other choice they could go down to Kinko's a pay someone a few bucks to do a fast template design.
Instead, absolutely nothing happened. Time dwindled away, and now the AGA doesn't have rank certificates. This was something that was supposedly a high priority. I realized that 'high priority' was just a code word for 'nice to have if you deliver it in a packaged deal all ready to go.'
If the AGA is going to move, it has to have real priorities, where lesser things are dropped in order to advance important things to completion. The priorities need to be agreed upon and communicated to everyone so that the necessary resources can be marshalled. Otherwise, the only advancement that the organization will be able to make is with projects that a single person can start and finish, without any involvement from the leadership. That doesn't bring the AGA very far.