Logical players, intuitive players ..

Talk about improving your game, resources you like, games you played, etc.

Are you a logical player or an intuitive player?

Logical player
13
27%
Intuitive player
21
43%
Richard Nixon (Probably warrants an explanatory note)
15
31%
 
Total votes: 49

hyperpape
Tengen
Posts: 4382
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 3:24 pm
Rank: AGA 3k
GD Posts: 65
OGS: Hyperpape 4k
Location: Caldas da Rainha, Portugal
Has thanked: 499 times
Been thanked: 727 times

Re: Logical players, intuitive players ..

Post by hyperpape »

http://www.smbc-comics.com/?id=2556

Penrose's views of consciousness are special.
SmoothOper
Lives in sente
Posts: 946
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 9:38 am
Rank: IGS 5kyu
GD Posts: 0
KGS: KoDream
IGS: SmoothOper
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 41 times

Re: Logical players, intuitive players ..

Post by SmoothOper »

hyperpape wrote:You are confusing known truths with truths. There are obviously many unknown truths, for instance the value of x = 2349820948239048239056829046837279325897893472854789234798532 * 23904802981290582903859023890582349085903482590345890238542, which had not ever been computed* prior to my posting this comment. But this morning it was still true that there was a truth there.

* At least, it's extremely unlikely that it had been.



I appreciate your explanation, that there are truths in go only they are unknown, and your example as well, which is a computational problem, like factoring large primes. Factoring large primes is a game. If you knew how to factor any prime then you could essentially hack any system you wanted, since most encryption is based on people not being able to factor large primes. It isn't that the perfect information to do so isn't there, it is just that it would take even current state of the art computer systems a very long time to do so. So again not a logical game, maybe a computational game.
User avatar
cyclops
Lives in sente
Posts: 801
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 3:38 pm
Rank: KGS 7 kyu forever
GD Posts: 460
Location: Amsterdam (NL)
Has thanked: 353 times
Been thanked: 107 times
Contact:

Re: Logical players, intuitive players ..

Post by cyclops »

Uberdude wrote:The esteemed mathematical physicist Roger Penrose has argued that to understand human consciousnous we need to understand quantum gravity. Now that Robert has established this is not the case I look forward to him publishing his research on the matter so that civilisation's understanding of this fascinating and profound subject is advanced.


I also read Penrose's [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Emperor%27s_New_Mind"]book[/url]. The claims you refer to are only speculations, call it intuitions. I think RJ can pospone his publishing until RP has backed up his hypothesises with some more evidence.

BTW I liked most parts of the book but were sceptical towards the theories you refer to.
User avatar
HermanHiddema
Gosei
Posts: 2011
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:08 am
Rank: Dutch 4D
GD Posts: 645
Universal go server handle: herminator
Location: Groningen, NL
Has thanked: 202 times
Been thanked: 1086 times

Re: Logical players, intuitive players ..

Post by HermanHiddema »

So here's an experiment to see how logical/intuitive players are.

Here's a go problem. Please time yourself. How long did it take you to solve? How strong are you?

Black to play and live.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ------------------------
$$ . . . . X . . O X X . . .
$$ . O . O X . . X O . O O .
$$ . . . O X O O X O . . . .
$$ . . . O X O X X O . O . .
$$ . . . O X X X . O . . . .
$$ . . . O O O O O . . . . .
$$ . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ . . . . . . . . . . . . .[/go]
User avatar
shapenaji
Lives in sente
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:58 pm
Rank: EGF 4d
GD Posts: 952
Location: Netherlands
Has thanked: 407 times
Been thanked: 422 times

Re: Logical players, intuitive players ..

Post by shapenaji »

HermanHiddema wrote:So here's an experiment to see how logical/intuitive players are.

Here's a go problem. Please time yourself. How long did it take you to solve? How strong are you?

Black to play and live.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ------------------------
$$ . . . . X . . O X X . . .
$$ . O . O X . . X O . O O .
$$ . . . O X O O X O . . . .
$$ . . . O X O X X O . O . .
$$ . . . O X X X . O . . . .
$$ . . . O O O O O . . . . .
$$ . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ . . . . . . . . . . . . .[/go]


About 3 seconds, but I've seen similar problems before.
Tactics yes, Tact no...
speedchase
Lives in sente
Posts: 800
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:36 pm
Rank: AGA 2kyu
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: speedchase
Has thanked: 139 times
Been thanked: 122 times

Re: Logical players, intuitive players ..

Post by speedchase »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ ------------------------
$$ . . . . X 3 2 O X X . . .
$$ . O . O X 1 . X O . O O .
$$ . . . O X O O X O . . . .
$$ . . . O X O X X O . O . .
$$ . . . O X X X . O . . . .
$$ . . . O O O O O . . . . .
$$ . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$$ . . . . . . . . . . . . .[/go]

It took me about a minute, what does that mean about me being logical vs intuitive?
Splatted
Lives in sente
Posts: 734
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:41 pm
Rank: Washed up never was
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: Splatted
Has thanked: 681 times
Been thanked: 138 times

Re: Logical players, intuitive players ..

Post by Splatted »

Somewhere between 1 and 2 minutes (same solution as speedchase), but what does that tell us? Was I slow because I'm a logical player that thinks things through carefully, or was I slow because I usually rely on intuition and so am bad at reading things out?
User avatar
HermanHiddema
Gosei
Posts: 2011
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:08 am
Rank: Dutch 4D
GD Posts: 645
Universal go server handle: herminator
Location: Groningen, NL
Has thanked: 202 times
Been thanked: 1086 times

Re: Logical players, intuitive players ..

Post by HermanHiddema »

Splatted wrote:Somewhere between 1 and 2 minutes (same solution as speedchase), but what does that tell us? Was I slow because I'm a logical player that thinks things through carefully, or was I slow because I usually rely on intuition and so am bad at reading things out?


You were not slow. I've seen players around 3 kyu give up after 5-10 minutes without solving it.
Splatted
Lives in sente
Posts: 734
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:41 pm
Rank: Washed up never was
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: Splatted
Has thanked: 681 times
Been thanked: 138 times

Re: Logical players, intuitive players ..

Post by Splatted »

That's certainly nice to hear. :D

I always thought I was really slow. XD
User avatar
jts
Oza
Posts: 2662
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:17 pm
Rank: kgs 6k
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 310 times
Been thanked: 632 times

Re: Logical players, intuitive players ..

Post by jts »

What's strange is that I looked at it, had to close the window, and solved it in my head... and when I looked back, it was mirrored. Herman, did you play with the orientation of the diagram for some reason?
illluck
Lives in sente
Posts: 1223
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 5:07 am
Rank: OGS 2d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: illluck
Tygem: Trickprey
OGS: illluck
Has thanked: 736 times
Been thanked: 239 times

Re: Logical players, intuitive players ..

Post by illluck »

About 20 seconds to see the move (more accurately, refute the obviously wrong alternatives) and another 20-30 seconds to verify, KGS 2-3d (but I've also seen the problem before and so know what the goal is).
skydyr
Oza
Posts: 2495
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:06 am
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: skydyr
Online playing schedule: When my wife is out.
Location: DC
Has thanked: 156 times
Been thanked: 436 times

Re: Logical players, intuitive players ..

Post by skydyr »

As a 2-4 kyu, I think it took me a minute, maybe 2. What I'm wondering is how this is supposed to show a distinction between logical and intuitive players?
speedchase
Lives in sente
Posts: 800
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:36 pm
Rank: AGA 2kyu
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: speedchase
Has thanked: 139 times
Been thanked: 122 times

Re: Logical players, intuitive players ..

Post by speedchase »

I think the point is that the problem is counter intuitive, so if you can solve it just like any other tsumego, you are very logical, but if it is especially difficult for you, then you are intuitive
User avatar
Loons
Gosei
Posts: 1378
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:17 am
GD Posts: 0
Location: wHam!lton, Aotearoa
Has thanked: 253 times
Been thanked: 105 times

Re: Logical players, intuitive players ..

Post by Loons »

Conversely, I am in the same boots as Shapenaji. "Oh, it's one of these".
Revisiting Go - Study Journal
My Programming Blog - About the evolution of my go bot.
User avatar
HermanHiddema
Gosei
Posts: 2011
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:08 am
Rank: Dutch 4D
GD Posts: 645
Universal go server handle: herminator
Location: Groningen, NL
Has thanked: 202 times
Been thanked: 1086 times

Re: Logical players, intuitive players ..

Post by HermanHiddema »

speedchase wrote:I think the point is that the problem is counter intuitive, so if you can solve it just like any other tsumego, you are very logical, but if it is especially difficult for you, then you are intuitive


Yes.

There are only four possible moves, as there is clearly no escape to the outside. There are, then, only three possible answers. And for black's second move, only two moves left. Basically, there are only 4 x 3 x 2 = 24 lines of play to check. A 20 kyu with just some basic knowledge of eyes and dead shapes should be able to solve this by going through all of them systematically.

I've seen a 8 kyu solve it in about 30 seconds, but I've seen strong kyu players fail to solve it.

And these same strong kyu players were able to solve a problem like this:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W White to play and kill.
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . X O . . . . .
$$ | . . . X O . O . .
$$ | . O . X O . . . .
$$ | X X X X O . . . .
$$ | . O O O O . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


Which has many more points to consider, and a much longer main line.

So these players do not consider every line of play, even in a very small space. They consider only moves which they find intuitive. At some fundamental level, they do not approach the game logically, they approach it intuitively. And they are not weaker players for it.
Post Reply