To be heavy or not to be (heavy), that is the question

For lessons, as well as threads about specific moves, and anything else worth studying.
Post Reply
User avatar
leichtloeslich
Lives in gote
Posts: 314
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 1:16 pm
Rank: KGS 4k
GD Posts: 0
Location: Germany
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 128 times

To be heavy or not to be (heavy), that is the question

Post by leichtloeslich »

So me and Ootakamoku reviewed a game of some 5k in the KGS teaching ladder, when we had a surprisingly strong disagreement about the value of some stones.

Here's the position:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X X . X . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . X O X . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X X O O . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O . O . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . B . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X O X X . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . O O X O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X X X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X O O O . . , . . . O O , X . . |
$$ | . O O O Y Y . . b O . . . O X X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . a . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
Black's last move is highlighted. I told the 5k that running out with those stones was a bad idea (tm). I said the g8-group is useless, because the white e9-group can easily jump to c and is fine.

However, Ootakamoku said it is indeed a good idea to run g8 out, because of the aji at the bottom caused by the triangled black stones (something like a or b). So basically they're a bunch of throw-away stones that we want to sacrifice to gain something nice somewhere else (probably at the bottom).


What do you guys think? Useful light aji-activators or potentially heavy attacking target?
DrStraw
Oza
Posts: 2180
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 4:09 am
Rank: AGA 5d
GD Posts: 4312
Online playing schedule: Every tenth February 29th from 20:00-20:01 (if time permits)
Location: ʍoquıɐɹ ǝɥʇ ɹǝʌo 'ǝɹǝɥʍǝɯos
Has thanked: 237 times
Been thanked: 662 times
Contact:

Re: To be heavy or not to be (heavy), that is the question

Post by DrStraw »

Those two stones don't really have a huge amount of aji as the corner is alive as it stands. So I agree with you. It may be possible to pull them out later, but not now. I'd be consider playing someone where the region of L6, but would have too look more carefully before deciding exactly where.
Still officially AGA 5d but I play so irregularly these days that I am probably only 3d or 4d over the board (but hopefully still 5d in terms of knowledge, theory and the ability to contribute).
emerus
Lives in gote
Posts: 577
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:28 pm
Rank: Fox Tygem 6d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: emerus
Tygem: emerus
OGS: emerus
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: To be heavy or not to be (heavy), that is the question

Post by emerus »

It looks very heavy. It would help if he'd show a clear way to use the aji and you would show why you thought the stones were so heavy. I'm sure you hashed though it in the review. (and lost your poor 5kyu in the process :)

I strongly agree with you though. There doesn't seem to be any clear value in that aji that would offset the "debt" of creating a heavy group.
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: To be heavy or not to be (heavy), that is the question

Post by Bill Spight »

The two Black stones are very weak. The best argument I can think of for running with those stones is that if Black simply gives them up it will be difficult to win the game.

But Black still has chances, particularly at the SDK level.

What is the theoretically best play? Maybe O-07, on the frontier of frameworks. But maybe that's not enterprising enough. Maybe M-07? M-09?
The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
User avatar
Solomon
Gosei
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:21 pm
Rank: AGA 5d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Capsule 4d
Tygem: 치킨까스 5d
Location: Bellevue, WA
Has thanked: 90 times
Been thanked: 835 times

Re: To be heavy or not to be (heavy), that is the question

Post by Solomon »

I think because White is stronger in the area than Black, the timing is not right; like trying to peel a banana that is too green. But the banana is small and the aji is not as strong as it seems, so I would hold off on the banana and play elsewhere.
Charles Matthews
Lives in gote
Posts: 450
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 9:12 am
Rank: BGA 3 dan
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 189 times

Re: To be heavy or not to be (heavy), that is the question

Post by Charles Matthews »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X X . X . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . X O X . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X X O O . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O . O . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . O . B . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X O X X . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . O O X O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X X X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X O O O . . , . . . O O , X . . |
$$ | . O O O Y Y . . . O . . . O X X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
Well, I think the play chosen isn't the good way to run out. One line higher is more tasteful.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X X . X . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . X O X . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X X O O . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O . O . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . O . X . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X O X X 2 . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . O O X O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X X X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X O O O . . , . . . O O , X . . |
$$ | . O O O B B . . . O . . . O X X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
If now White expects to get a good result from :w1:, :b2: is very useful to make the marked black stones look far more dangerous.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X X . X . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . X O X . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X X O O . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O . O . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , 2 . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . O . X . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X O X X 1 . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . O O X O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X X X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X O O O . . , . . . O O , X . . |
$$ | . O O O X X . . . O . . . O X X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
So we expect White, if anything, to reinforce the strong side with this :w1:. But then :b2: is quite practical.
User avatar
shapenaji
Lives in sente
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:58 pm
Rank: EGF 4d
GD Posts: 952
Location: Netherlands
Has thanked: 407 times
Been thanked: 422 times

Re: To be heavy or not to be (heavy), that is the question

Post by shapenaji »

Charles Matthews wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Wc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X X . X . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . X O X . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X X O O . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O . O . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , 2 . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . O . B . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X O X X 1 . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . O O X O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X X X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X O O O . . , . . . O O , X . . |
$$ | . O O O X X . . . O . . . O X X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
2 isn't sente though, I think I'd be happier as black just following Araban's line and coming back around this area when there's a clearer attack on white's three stones.
Tactics yes, Tact no...
Charles Matthews
Lives in gote
Posts: 450
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 9:12 am
Rank: BGA 3 dan
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 189 times

Re: To be heavy or not to be (heavy), that is the question

Post by Charles Matthews »

shapenaji wrote:2 isn't sente though, I think I'd be happier as black just following Araban's line and coming back around this area when there's a clearer attack on white's three stones.
In terms of middlegame and timing:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X X . X . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . X W X . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X X W W . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X . . 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O . O . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X O X X . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . O O X O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X X X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X O O O . . , . . . O O , X . . |
$$ | . O O O X X . . . O . . . O X X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
After :b1:, White cannot hold the upper group together. So would treat the marked stones lightly, I think. This means that Black should be concerned not just to take a small profit here, but to fight on a bigger scale.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X X . X . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . X O X . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X X O O . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X . 2 X 3 5 . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O . O 4 . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . O . a . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X O X X b . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . O O X O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X X X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X O O O . . , . . . O O , X . . |
$$ | . O O O X X . . . O . . . O X X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
This could happen, and White has to choose now whether to keep pushing with :w6: or not. My feeling is that getting the exchange of Black a, White b in first matters. The peep Black c looks useful very soon.

In any case Black's plan should be about preventing White swallowing up the centre in this game. The formation on the right side is not very well coordinated to do that.
User avatar
shapenaji
Lives in sente
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:58 pm
Rank: EGF 4d
GD Posts: 952
Location: Netherlands
Has thanked: 407 times
Been thanked: 422 times

Re: To be heavy or not to be (heavy), that is the question

Post by shapenaji »

Hmm? White can hold the group together...
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X X . X . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . X O X . . . . . O . . . . . |
$$ | . . O X X O O . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X . 3 1 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O a O . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X O X X b . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . O O X O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X X X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X O O O . . , . . . O O , X . . |
$$ | . O O O X X . . . O . . . O X X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
"a" does not successfully cut
Last edited by shapenaji on Sun Nov 02, 2014 8:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Tactics yes, Tact no...
Charles Matthews
Lives in gote
Posts: 450
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 9:12 am
Rank: BGA 3 dan
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 189 times

Re: To be heavy or not to be (heavy), that is the question

Post by Charles Matthews »

shapenaji wrote:Hmm? White can hold the group together... "a" does not successfully cut
Ah, good point, hadn't considered that. Black gets a number of peeps to play with, if White doesn't want the lite option.
User avatar
drmwc
Lives in gote
Posts: 452
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 2:18 pm
Rank: 4 Dan European
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 74 times
Been thanked: 100 times

Re: To be heavy or not to be (heavy), that is the question

Post by drmwc »

I also agree with the tenuki idea. I wouldn't actually think very hard about my next move, and play here:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X X . X . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . X O X . . . . . O . . 1 . . |
$$ | . . O X X O O . . , . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O . O . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X O X X b . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . O O X O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X X X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X O O O . . , . . . O O , X . . |
$$ | . O O O X X . . . O . . . O X X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
Black has a lot of aji at the bottom. The best way to eploit it is not yet clear (given the corner group is alive).

The 3-3 invasion is huge. For example:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X X . X . . . . . . . . . 6 5 . |
$$ | . . X . . X O X . . 8 . . O . 4 1 7 . |
$$ | . . O X X O O . . , . . . . . O 2 3 . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . O O . O . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . .. . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X O X X b . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . O O X O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X X X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X O O O . . , . . . O O , X . . |
$$ | . O O O X X . . . O . . . O X X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
Black ends in sente and can now think of the best ways to reduce the lower side. I thikn black leads.

Alternatively:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bc
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X X . X . . . . . . . 7 . . . . |
$$ | . . X . . X O X . . . . . O . . 1 5 . |
$$ | . . O X X O O . . , . . . . . O 2 3 . |
$$ | . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4 . |
$$ | . . O O . O . . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . X . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . X X O X X b . . . . . . . . . X . . |
$$ | . O O X O O O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | X X X X X X O . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . O X X O O O . . , . . . O O , X . . |
$$ | . O O O X X . . . O . . . O X X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
This also seems good for black. White's "thickness" is unikley to be effective here.
Post Reply