Handling approach on both side

For lessons, as well as threads about specific moves, and anything else worth studying.
User avatar
oca
Lives in gote
Posts: 699
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:53 am
Rank: DDK
GD Posts: 0
KGS: aco
IGS: oca
OGS: oca
Location: Switzerland
Has thanked: 485 times
Been thanked: 166 times

Handling approach on both side

Post by oca »

Hi,

I'm really not confortable when there is an approach on both side.
Let's say for example :
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . , . . . . . 1 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . 9 , . 6 . . . , . . . . . , . . . |
$$ | . . 7 4 . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . |
$$ | . b 8 . a d . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
What to do if white play :w10: here instead of 'a' or 'b' ?

- Doing a pincer at 'c' doesn't appeal me much because the top/left corner is white (:w2:)
but maybe that's the right move ?

- or should I play near 'd' ? looks difficult :w8: doesn't look that weak to me :scratch:

Any help very welcome...
Converting the book Shape UP! by Charles Matthews/Seong-June Kim
to the gobook format. last updated april 2015 - Index of shapes, p.211 / 216
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

Hi oca,
Locally:

If :b1: hane and :w2: connects, you're almost alive --
( W is not settled on either side. )
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . 4 . X . . . . . .
$$ | . 5 X , . O . . . ,
$$ | . . X O . . . . . .
$$ | . 1 O 2 . . . . . .
$$ | . 3 . . . . . . . .
$$ +--------------------[/go]
If :b1: hane and :w2: tenuki, you capture at least :wc: with :b3: --
( if :w4: connects at (a), you kill all with :b5: (b) )
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B :w2: tenuki
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . X , . O . . . ,
$$ | . . X O b . . . . .
$$ | . 1 W a 3 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ +--------------------[/go]
Re: Boidhre's search, :b1: kosumi is a big shared vital point:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . 1 . . . . .
$$ | . . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . X , . O . . . ,
$$ | . . X O . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ +--------------------[/go]
oca wrote:I'm really not comfortable when there is an approach on both sides.
One solution: study it, play it (die horribly many times), review it -- rinse and repeat.

Realize that if your opponent double approaches and he has two unsettled groups,
then you only need to take care of one group, whereas he has to take care of two.
Boidhre
Oza
Posts: 2356
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:15 pm
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: Boidhre
Location: Ireland
Has thanked: 661 times
Been thanked: 442 times

Re: Handling approach on both side

Post by Boidhre »

From a quick pattern search:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 0 . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . a . . . . .
$$ | . . . 5 . b . . . .
$$ | . . 9 , . 6 . . . ,
$$ | . . 7 4 c . . . . .
$$ | . . 8 . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ +--------------------[/go]
The most common pro responses for black, a 15 games, b 8 games, c 6 games. Not a big sample. (Naive weak reading) a seems to say you're happy to fight on either side, b seems to say white has a presence on the bottom and you want to get into the centre, c says you want to start a fight on the bottom. My interpretation is undoubtedly wrong but the moves might be of interest to you.
User avatar
Unusedname
Lives in gote
Posts: 447
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2012 7:23 pm
Rank: kgs 5kyu
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Unusedname
Has thanked: 137 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: Handling approach on both side

Post by Unusedname »

I remember having that discomfort, but it's hard to learn without trying and failing.

Your reason for not liking the counterpincer at c is good.
But consider this other reason.

Can you imagine what white will play after c?
white jumps one space up and nearly surrounds the black group. And now black doesn't have a good move to escape into the center.
So knowing this you can start to consider Boidhre's diagram.
Now the diagonal move a looks very good for black because it takes away white's chance to surround black and also threatens to pincer either side.
At least that's what I think I know.
User avatar
oca
Lives in gote
Posts: 699
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:53 am
Rank: DDK
GD Posts: 0
KGS: aco
IGS: oca
OGS: oca
Location: Switzerland
Has thanked: 485 times
Been thanked: 166 times

Re: Handling approach on both side

Post by oca »

Thank you all for your replies, my problem with 'a' is that I don't want white to have both side and me just having a kind of snake spliting two alive groups...
So my problem is maybe that I don't make sever enough moves. I Will try to play more that kind of move, and see what happend... That's the best way to learn...
Converting the book Shape UP! by Charles Matthews/Seong-June Kim
to the gobook format. last updated april 2015 - Index of shapes, p.211 / 216
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

oca wrote:I don't want white to have both side and me just having a kind of snake spliting two alive groups...
Hi oca,

Locally, you have spent 4 moves on 1 group; W has also spent 4 moves, but split between 2 groups.
Neither of W's groups is settled.
To begin to understand the meaning of :b1: kosumi takes a lot of study and experience.
And many horrible deaths, that goes without saying. :mrgreen:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . 1 . . . . .
$$ | . . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . X , . O . . . ,
$$ | . . X O . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ +--------------------[/go]
Uberdude
Judan
Posts: 6727
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 11:35 am
Rank: UK 4 dan
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Uberdude 4d
OGS: Uberdude 7d
Location: Cambridge, UK
Has thanked: 436 times
Been thanked: 3718 times

Re: Handling approach on both side

Post by Uberdude »

There are actually quite a few reasonable local choices (of course global position can affect how good or bad they are), but I would recommend coming out with the kosumi for your level as it is simple and clear. It keeps your group safe and not surrounded, and white can only help one or other of his side groups so you can hurt the other one next. This is a very common idea in double approach situations, come out and you make miai to either side. Of course what follow-up you then do on the sides can be tricky, and you do have to be wary of playing softly and not severely enough and getting a bit of a duff snake not doing much through the middle, but if you aren't surrounded at least you aren't going to die.
Boidhre
Oza
Posts: 2356
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:15 pm
GD Posts: 0
Universal go server handle: Boidhre
Location: Ireland
Has thanked: 661 times
Been thanked: 442 times

Re: Handling approach on both side

Post by Boidhre »

oca wrote:Thank you all for your replies, my problem with 'a' is that I don't want white to have both side and me just having a kind of snake spliting two alive groups...
Consider the difference to this diagram:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . 1 . . . . .
$$ | . . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . X , . O . . . ,
$$ | . . X O . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . O . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ +--------------------[/go]
User avatar
oca
Lives in gote
Posts: 699
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:53 am
Rank: DDK
GD Posts: 0
KGS: aco
IGS: oca
OGS: oca
Location: Switzerland
Has thanked: 485 times
Been thanked: 166 times

Re: Handling approach on both side

Post by oca »

Boidhre wrote:
oca wrote:Thank you all for your replies, my problem with 'a' is that I don't want white to have both side and me just having a kind of snake spliting two alive groups...
Consider the difference to this diagram:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . 1 . . . . .
$$ | . . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . X , . O . . . ,
$$ | . . X O . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . O . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ +--------------------[/go]
Sure this is really different, and in the same time only one more stone... well but it will be black's turn now and that also change things a bit... If that was white turn, that would be more difficult...
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . Q . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . 1 . . . . .
$$ | . . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . X , . O . . . ,
$$ | . . X O . . . . . .
$$ | . . O . 2 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . . .
$$ +--------------------[/go]
Converting the book Shape UP! by Charles Matthews/Seong-June Kim
to the gobook format. last updated april 2015 - Index of shapes, p.211 / 216
User avatar
oca
Lives in gote
Posts: 699
Joined: Wed Feb 19, 2014 2:53 am
Rank: DDK
GD Posts: 0
KGS: aco
IGS: oca
OGS: oca
Location: Switzerland
Has thanked: 485 times
Been thanked: 166 times

Re: Handling approach on both side

Post by oca »

Here is another position that occured in a 6 stones handicap I played last week in my go club (no sgf...) :
I failed to handle that situation and my top/right group died...
The annoying move was :w9: but I think I did the mistake later...

When I just look at the position now, that looks easy for black, but in the game, white surrounded me... and I noticed too late... not that much too late, maybe only one move, but that still make a group live or die...

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 . . . |
$$ | . . . . . 1 . . . . . 4 . 3 . 5 6 . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . 8 X a . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 . . |
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ +---------------------------------------+[/go]
I played :b10: at 'a' which I think is correct and then I don't exactly remember what I did...

something like that I think, but I'm not sure this was the exact :w11:. I remember I played :b12:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm10
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . 3 . . X . O . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . 2 X X 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |[/go]
Converting the book Shape UP! by Charles Matthews/Seong-June Kim
to the gobook format. last updated april 2015 - Index of shapes, p.211 / 216
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

oca wrote:Sure this is really different, and in the same time only one more stone
Hi oca, W has two more local stones, one for each of his two groups.
( W 6 local stones vs. B 4 local stones; W has 2 more. )
That's one thing Boidhre's diagram illustrates:
W needs two more moves to settle both his groups.
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

oca wrote:The annoying move was :w9:
Hi oca, :w9: is a not annoying at all.
It's a big thank-you move.
You are happy to connect with :b10: .
W gets a broken shape. :w9: is a bad move.
If your UR corner died, it's your mistakes later, not :b10: .
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

oca wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm10
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . 3 . . X . O . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . 2 X X 1 . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]
Hi oca,
For example, instead of "running away" with :b12: ,
did you consider the hane :b1: ?
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . . . . X . O . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . O X X X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . O . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]
If W plays like this, he is helping you so much on the right side:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Variation A
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . . . . X . O . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , 5 4 . O X X X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1 . . O . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . 3 . ? ? ? . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ? ? ? . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ? ? ? . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . . . . X . . . |[/go]
If W makes the empty triangle, then you can consider the 2-space jump & pincer:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Variation B
$$ +---------------------------------------+
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O . . . |
$$ | . . . . . O . . 3 . . X . O . O X . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . , . . 2 O X X X . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . . O . . |
$$ | . . . X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ | . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]
The hane :b1: should be a first feeling:
  • You block W, making it harder to get out;
  • You are ahead of W;
  • You are on the outside (control of the center), useful;
  • W is on the inside (neutral points, not very useful).
If you read that :b1: hane doesn't work, then you consider other options.
Your :b12: feels like "running away" from a fight,
like taking a holiday when you're in the middle of a battle.
The current fight is upper right -- urgent.
User avatar
EdLee
Honinbo
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:49 pm
GD Posts: 312
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Has thanked: 349 times
Been thanked: 2070 times

Post by EdLee »

oca wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ +-------------------+
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . 7 . . . |
$$ . . 4 . 3 . 5 6 . . |
$$ , . . . . 8 X . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . 9 . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]
Hi oca,
The attach :w5: and :w7: descent in the game feel heavy for White.

Instead, W has the option to counter-hane:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ +-------------------+
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . 1 . . |
$$ . . X . O . O X . . |
$$ , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]
Or, W can take 3-3 directly:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ +-------------------+
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . X . O . . 1 . . |
$$ , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]
Or, double approach (high or low):
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ +-------------------+
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . X . O . . . . . |
$$ , . . . . . X . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |
$$ . . . . . . 1 . . . |
$$ . . . . . . . . . . |[/go]
Bill Spight
Honinbo
Posts: 10905
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 1:24 pm
Has thanked: 3651 times
Been thanked: 3373 times

Re: Handling approach on both side

Post by Bill Spight »

Some ideas about the 6 stone position. :)

The Adkins Principle:
At some point, doesn't thinking have to go on?
— Winona Adkins

Visualize whirled peas.

Everything with love. Stay safe.
Post Reply