Played this game on Tygem, as black. Any comments are most welcome.
review tygem game
-
jorden
- Dies in gote
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2016 7:21 am
- Rank: DDK
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
review tygem game
- Attachments
-
- kaka1818(14K)_trentino(14K)_201701052301.sgf
- (1.4 KiB) Downloaded 507 times
-
Calvin Clark
- Lives in gote
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 8:43 am
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 186 times
- Been thanked: 191 times
-
nasdaq
- Dies in gote
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 4:34 pm
- Rank: 1k
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: review tygem game
[*] N4 is interesting move, usual is to stop white getting a base and do it from direction of your weak group, so J3
[*] P17 seems small, mybe try K16 or somewhere around K12 or somewhere top left corner
[*] K10 better at L10
[*] P17 seems small, mybe try K16 or somewhere around K12 or somewhere top left corner
[*] K10 better at L10
-
jorden
- Dies in gote
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2016 7:21 am
- Rank: DDK
- GD Posts: 0
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: review tygem game
Thanks Calvin Clark & nasdaq. I might have the wrong idea about what to do with a framework and what priorities I should give to reducing/invading my opponents framework versus building up my own (probably it should be: if your opponent is getting a bigger/more easily defended framework, then reduce/invade). J3 instead of N4 seems very much better in retrospect 