Trick play: 3-5 low approach, 3-2 invasion. Thoughts?

For lessons, as well as threads about specific moves, and anything else worth studying.
User avatar
HermanHiddema
Gosei
Posts: 2011
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:08 am
Rank: Dutch 4D
GD Posts: 645
Universal go server handle: herminator
Location: Groningen, NL
Has thanked: 202 times
Been thanked: 1086 times

Trick play: 3-5 low approach, 3-2 invasion. Thoughts?

Post by HermanHiddema »

So I came accross this trick play:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . O . . . . .
$$ | . . . , . . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]



What are your thoughts? How to respond?

Some ideas:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 4 6 8 . . .
$$ | . . 2 O 3 . 7 . .
$$ | . . . , 5 . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . 9 . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


White ends up very low

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 2 . . . . .
$$ | . . 3 O . . . . .
$$ | . . 5 4 . . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . 6 . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


White's wall feels thin, black gets a large corner and sente to neutralize the wall.


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 . . . . . .
$$ | . d 3 O . . . . a
$$ | . 2 4 5 7 . . . .
$$ | . . B 6 9 . . . .
$$ | . . 8 0 c . . . .
$$ | . . . . . b . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


:b11: at a, b, c or tenuki, depending on the position?

The stone at :bc: makes d sente for black as well, but when do you play it?


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . O . 6 . 7 .
$$ | . . 2 4 . . . . .
$$ | . . X 3 5 . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


Still plenty of aji in the :b1: stone. :w2: and :w4: are bad style/shape
User avatar
Dusk Eagle
Gosei
Posts: 1758
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 4:02 pm
Rank: 4d
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 378 times
Been thanked: 375 times

Re: Trick play: 3-5 low approach, 3-2 invasion. Thoughts?

Post by Dusk Eagle »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 . . . . . .
$$ | . d 3 O . . . . a
$$ | . 2 4 5 7 . . . .
$$ | . . B 6 9 . . . .
$$ | . . 8 0 c . . . .
$$ | . . . . . b . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]

Isn't 'd' double sente, or at the very least, will turn into sente very early for white? I would probably play it straight away as black. If white ignores, he has a much weaker group on his hands. It does sacrifice a bit of aji though, but not a lot.

I wish I had time to post more thoughts, but I have to run to class now.
We don't know who we are; we don't know where we are.
Each of us woke up one moment and here we were in the darkness.
We're nameless things with no memory; no knowledge of what went before,
No understanding of what is now, no knowledge of what will be.
User avatar
Tommie
Dies with sente
Posts: 124
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:56 am
Rank: 3d EGF
GD Posts: 1700
Location: still above sea level: http://bit.ly/eQYULx
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Trick play: 3-5 low approach, 3-2 invasion. Thoughts?

Post by Tommie »

HermanHiddema wrote:So I came accross this trick play:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . O . . . . .
$$ | . . . , . . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]



What are your thoughts? How to respond?

Some ideas:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 4 6 8 . . .
$$ | . . 2 O 3 . 7 . .
$$ | . . . , 5 . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . 9 . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


White ends up very low
(...)


Very interesting position

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B starting position
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 b . . . . .
$$ | . . a O . . . . .
$$ | . c d . . . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


A
Just :w4: above looked submissive to me, hence I would try to induce it by cutting first,
to make it look like a good move.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 8 7 . . . .
$$ | . . 2 O 3 6 . . .
$$ | . . . 5 4 . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


However ...

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 5 . . . . .
$$ | . . 2 O 3 . . . .
$$ | . . . . 4 . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


if B then also exchanges :b5: to this here,
then I am back to square one in this 'fight for shape'.
Here I would like to ponder further on (which I cannot do right now (work ;-) :oops: :lol: ))

Very difficult (because evaluation of shapes) and I just gave my initial thoughts.
All other diagrams I evaluate prima facie inferior anyway.

Going back to the starting position, we see that you offered options A to D until now.

D
Many dan players would (appeal to authority) - agree with me that option D appears to be one of the worst shapes in general.
In vicinity of the edge, the corner and in need for sente, there might be exceptions (which might 'proof the rule' :-) - still, I am not convinced.

B Your diagram for B has some appeal to me. However, B could reduce immediately a W wall to nothing. Only possible if there would be already a W stone in a decent distance.

C In contrast, option C looks so good for B, as you could imagine another B stone at one of the options you gave (B11 = C).
For full-board evaluation I had to discount the tally then, i.e. that B would have played twice more in this position (the 'hamete' + the last gote).
This is a difficult mental operation, as I do not know WHAT could have been played elsewhere. If I assume two corner stones or 1 shimari for White, then I still might prefer this option for White.
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B B11 = C
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 . . . . . .
$$ | . d 3 O . . . . a
$$ | . 2 4 5 7 . . . .
$$ | . . B 6 9 . . . .
$$ | . . 8 0 B . . . .
$$ | . . . . . b . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]
Last edited by Tommie on Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:09 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Greetings,
Tommie

3dan EGF (AGA no 13477) || Tommie on KGS: 'June'|| DGS: 'Zhi Laohu' 纸老虎 = 'paper tiger' || Senseis : http://senseis.xmp.net/?tderz ||
ENFP (MBTI) - 'Find your own style within the Fundamentals of Go! '
User avatar
Magicwand
Tengen
Posts: 4844
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 5:26 am
Rank: Wbaduk 7D
GD Posts: 0
KGS: magicwand
Tygem: magicwand
Wbaduk: rlatkfkd
DGS: magicwand
OGS: magicwand
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 504 times

Re: Trick play: 3-5 low approach, 3-2 invasion. Thoughts?

Post by Magicwand »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O O O . . .
$$ | . . O O X . X . .
$$ | . . . , X . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . X . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]





Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O O X . . . .
$$ | . . O X . X . . .
$$ | . . O X . . . . .
$$ | . O X . . . . . .
$$ | . O X . . . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]



let's compare one of your diag and compare with simple well known joseky.
in my opinion they are not much different.
you must remember that black played one more stone on the corner to get that advantage.
in my opinion they yield similar result.

personally i like below diag the most
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O . . . . .
$$ | . O O X X . . . .
$$ | . . X O X . . . .
$$ | . . O O . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]
"The more we think we know about
The greater the unknown"

Words by neil peart, music by geddy lee and alex lifeson
User avatar
topazg
Tengen
Posts: 4511
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:08 am
Rank: Nebulous
GD Posts: 918
KGS: topazg
Location: Chatteris, UK
Has thanked: 1579 times
Been thanked: 650 times
Contact:

Re: Trick play: 3-5 low approach, 3-2 invasion. Thoughts?

Post by topazg »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 5 7 . . . .
$$ | . . 2 O 3 6 . . .
$$ | . . . 8 4 . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


This is my first instinct
User avatar
HermanHiddema
Gosei
Posts: 2011
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:08 am
Rank: Dutch 4D
GD Posts: 645
Universal go server handle: herminator
Location: Groningen, NL
Has thanked: 202 times
Been thanked: 1086 times

Re: Trick play: 3-5 low approach, 3-2 invasion. Thoughts?

Post by HermanHiddema »

Magicwand wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X O O O . . .
$$ | . . O O X . X . .
$$ | . . . , X . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . X . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]





Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . O O X . . . .
$$ | . . O X . X . . .
$$ | . . O X . . . . .
$$ | . O X . . . . . .
$$ | . O X . . . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]



let's compare one of your diag and compare with simple well known joseky.
in my opinion they are not much different.
you must remember that black played one more stone on the corner to get that advantage.
in my opinion they yield similar result.


Yes, I agree these are similar. But the 3-3 invasion under 4-4 is not really a general purpose joseki, but mostly played in specific circumstances where the resulting outside black wall is not totally effective. White gets completely locked into the corner. If we compare with another simple and reasonable joseki:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . 7 1 3 . 9 . . .
$$ | . 5 2 X 4 . . . .
$$ | . 6 8 . . . . . .
$$ | . . W 0 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . X . . . . .[/go]


Here, black also plays one more stone, and white also gets territory in exchange for influence, But now the :w9: stone is outside and influences the rest of the game. Normally, this is just better for white than the above two diagrams.

This is why white normally approaches on the outside (at :wc: in the diagram) instead of invading 3-3 directly.
User avatar
HermanHiddema
Gosei
Posts: 2011
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:08 am
Rank: Dutch 4D
GD Posts: 645
Universal go server handle: herminator
Location: Groningen, NL
Has thanked: 202 times
Been thanked: 1086 times

Re: Trick play: 3-5 low approach, 3-2 invasion. Thoughts?

Post by HermanHiddema »

topazg wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 5 7 . . . .
$$ | . . 2 O 3 6 . . .
$$ | . . . 8 4 . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


This is my first instinct



Now black will cut, of course.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm9
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | 8 6 X X X . . . .
$$ | 7 3 O O X O 2 . .
$$ | 0 4 5 O O 1 . . .
$$ | . . X . 9 . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm19
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | O O X X X . . . .
$$ | 2 1 O O X O O . .
$$ | O O X O O X . . .
$$ | . 5 X 3 X . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


:w22: @ :b19:

And white collapses.
User avatar
gaius
Lives in gote
Posts: 476
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:55 am
Rank: Dutch 2 dan
GD Posts: 56
KGS: hopjesvla
Has thanked: 193 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Re: Trick play: 3-5 low approach, 3-2 invasion. Thoughts?

Post by gaius »

So let's complicate things then:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 5 6 8 a . .
$$ | . c 2 O 3 7 b . .
$$ | . . . d 4 . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]

There are so many possibilies for black now; a-d all look interesting. Will white be OK?
My name is Gijs, from Utrecht, NL.

When in doubt, play the most aggressive move
User avatar
topazg
Tengen
Posts: 4511
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:08 am
Rank: Nebulous
GD Posts: 918
KGS: topazg
Location: Chatteris, UK
Has thanked: 1579 times
Been thanked: 650 times
Contact:

Re: Trick play: 3-5 low approach, 3-2 invasion. Thoughts?

Post by topazg »

HermanHiddema wrote:
topazg wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 5 7 . . . .
$$ | . . 2 O 3 6 . . .
$$ | . . . 8 4 . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


This is my first instinct



Now black will cut, of course.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm9
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | 8 6 X X X . . . .
$$ | 7 3 O O X O 2 . .
$$ | 0 4 5 O O 1 . . .
$$ | . . X . 9 . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm19
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | O O X X X . . . .
$$ | 2 1 O O X O O . .
$$ | O O X O O X . . .
$$ | . 5 X 3 X . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


:w22: @ :b19:

And white collapses.


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm9 With ladder
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X X X . . . .
$$ | . 3 O O X O 2 . .
$$ | . 5 . O O 1 6 . .
$$ | . . X . . 4 . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]



Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm9 Without ladder
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . 7 X X X . . . .
$$ | . 5 O O X O . . .
$$ | . 6 . O O 1 3 . .
$$ | . 8 X . . 2 . . .
$$ | . . . . 4 . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


Second one smells bad though :P I think one of your variations is better without the ladder, though I've seen worse. That single captured stone has some useful aji still.
User avatar
HermanHiddema
Gosei
Posts: 2011
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:08 am
Rank: Dutch 4D
GD Posts: 645
Universal go server handle: herminator
Location: Groningen, NL
Has thanked: 202 times
Been thanked: 1086 times

Re: Trick play: 3-5 low approach, 3-2 invasion. Thoughts?

Post by HermanHiddema »

topazg wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm9 With ladder
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X X X . . . .
$$ | . 3 O O X O 2 . .
$$ | . 5 . O O 1 6 . .
$$ | . . X . . 4 . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]




Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm9 No eye for white
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X X X . . . .
$$ | . 3 O O X O 2 . .
$$ | . . . O O 1 6 . .
$$ | . . X 7 5 4 . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]




Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm9 Sacrifice
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X X X . . . .
$$ | . 3 O O X O 2 . .
$$ | . . . O O 1 . . .
$$ | . . X 6 5 4 . . .
$$ | . . . 7 8 . . . .
$$ | . . . 9 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


But I like the exchange for black, sacrificing :b13: to get :b15: and :b17:


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm9 Without ladder
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . 7 X X X . . . .
$$ | . 5 O O X O . . .
$$ | . 6 . O O 1 3 . .
$$ | . 8 X . . 2 . . .
$$ | . . . . 4 . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


Second one smells bad though :P I think one of your variations is better without the ladder, though I've seen worse. That single captured stone has some useful aji still.


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bcm9 Without ladder
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X X X . . . .
$$ | . . O O X O . . .
$$ | . . . O O 1 3 . .
$$ | . . X . . 2 . . .
$$ | . . . . 4 . . . .
$$ | . . . 5 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


I would want to look at this :b13: instead :)
User avatar
Shaddy
Lives in sente
Posts: 1206
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:44 pm
Rank: KGS 5d
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Str1fe, Midorisuke
Has thanked: 51 times
Been thanked: 192 times

Re: Trick play: 3-5 low approach, 3-2 invasion. Thoughts?

Post by Shaddy »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 3 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 2 . . . . .
$$ | . . . 4 . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


This move, maybe? If black tries to connect underneath, he'll get screwed by the cuts. So he needs another move, but I can't see another good move.
User avatar
HermanHiddema
Gosei
Posts: 2011
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:08 am
Rank: Dutch 4D
GD Posts: 645
Universal go server handle: herminator
Location: Groningen, NL
Has thanked: 202 times
Been thanked: 1086 times

Re: Trick play: 3-5 low approach, 3-2 invasion. Thoughts?

Post by HermanHiddema »

Shaddy wrote:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm5
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . O . . . . .
$$ | . . . O . . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


This move, maybe? If black tries to connect underneath, he'll get screwed by the cuts. So he needs another move, but I can't see another good move.


My instinct would be to push up, like this:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm5
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . 3 . O . . . . .
$$ | . . . O . 2 . . .
$$ | . . X 1 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


If white jumps out, the connection under works again.

So white should try to cut?

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm5
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X 4 . . . . .
$$ | . . . O . 3 . . .
$$ | . 2 . O . . . . .
$$ | . . X 1 . 5 . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


Now there is still some aji in the corner


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm5
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . 2 4 O . 5 . . .
$$ | . 3 . O . . . . .
$$ | . . X 1 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


And this is really a complete disaster.
User avatar
HermanHiddema
Gosei
Posts: 2011
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 10:08 am
Rank: Dutch 4D
GD Posts: 645
Universal go server handle: herminator
Location: Groningen, NL
Has thanked: 202 times
Been thanked: 1086 times

Re: Trick play: 3-5 low approach, 3-2 invasion. Thoughts?

Post by HermanHiddema »

gaius wrote:So let's complicate things then:
Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 1 5 6 8 a . .
$$ | . c 2 O 3 7 b . .
$$ | . . . d 4 . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]

There are so many possibilies for black now; a-d all look interesting. Will white be OK?


Black a looks devastating, e.g:

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm9
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . X X O O 1 4 .
$$ | . 7 O O X X 2 6 .
$$ | . . . . O 3 5 . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$Bm9
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . 5 . . . .
$$ | . 4 X X O O 1 . .
$$ | . 8 O O X X 3 . .
$$ | . 7 . . O 2 . . .
$$ | . . X 6 . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 9 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]
Fredrik
Dies in gote
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun May 02, 2010 8:01 am
Rank: EGF 6d
GD Posts: 0
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 33 times

Re: Trick play: 3-5 low approach, 3-2 invasion. Thoughts?

Post by Fredrik »

Interesting!

Sorry that i'm too lazy to look into how to create diagrams :cool:, but I would like to say that your first post is a great result for White in my opinion. (where you say White ended up too low)

If someone gets my following sentences, please illustrate a diagram for me (if they think it's worthwile :-) )

Lets imagine Black 1 at 5, White in response slide with 8 (which is a dubious move, but we can't say it's a bad one). Black then proceeds to exchange 3 with 6, which is clearly damaging. He then exchanges 1 for 2!!!

He then proceeds to jump with 7, and White in return play the thick move of 4 removing all the aji in the corner. Black then takes gote with a protecting jump.

There is two important factors here:

Like Magicwand said in his post:

1. It was Blacks corner from the beginning, he should get the better result locally.
2. White gets sente.

So in this local corner, Black plays 2! more moves than White, and locally I think the position is even (White after all has 10 points of points, and Black still has some defect in his shape like White's peep at 5-5.

(Is my point understandable? I do know how to create an sgf file, I can do that otherwise =) )
User avatar
Mnemonic
Lives in gote
Posts: 324
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 10:41 pm
Rank: KGS 7 kyu
GD Posts: 0
KGS: Mnemonic, dude13
Location: Dresden
Has thanked: 26 times
Been thanked: 22 times

Re: Trick play: 3-5 low approach, 3-2 invasion. Thoughts?

Post by Mnemonic »

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$B Like this?
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 5 . 4 2 . . .
$$ | . . 6 O 3 . . . .
$$ | . . . , 1 . . . .
$$ | . . X . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


FWIW, I looked into my database and came up with very few results (which is understandable if it's a trick play). But every time Black played :b1: white had another stone in the vicinity.

Click Here To Show Diagram Code
[go]$$W this was the only time I found this sort of play
$$ +------------------
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 4 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . 1 . . . . .
$$ | . . . , . . . . .
$$ | . . 2 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . 3 . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .
$$ | . . . . . . . . .[/go]


I then consulted sensais library and kogo's, but they had neither the trick play nor this response to a 34 point low pincer. Would have been too easy :)
While I was teaching the game to a friend of mine, my mother from the other room:
"Cutting? Killing? Poking out eyes? What the hell are you playing?"
Post Reply